Interaction appearance theory: Changing perceptions of physical attractiveness through social interaction

被引:18
作者
Albada, KF [1 ]
Knapp, ML
Theune, KE
机构
[1] N Carolina State Univ, Dept Commun, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA
[2] Univ Texas, Dept Commun Studies, Austin, TX 78712 USA
[3] Montgomery Coll, Conroe, TX USA
关键词
D O I
10.1093/ct/12.1.8
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
Can the effectiveness of your social interaction with a prospective romantic partner make him or her see you as more physically attractive? If so, under what conditions does this process occur? These questions prompted the development of a theoretical perspective to explain this process. Interaction appearance theory (IAT) requires (a) a set of beliefs about the importance and interdependence of physical attractiveness and social interaction in a satisfactory romantic relationship; (b) an initial perception of the other's physical attractiveness that is not high enough to trigger the pursuit of a romantic relationship but is not low enough to preclude it; (c) social interaction that is eventually perceived as more desirable than the perception of the other's physical attractiveness; and (d) bringing the discrepant perceptions into alignment by actually seeing the other person as more physically attractive. While providing support for the theory, the interviews in Study 1 also provided insights into how the process can vary. Study 2, using a sample of new daters, provided quantitative support for the belief structure. Study 3, using diaries, found changes in perceptions of a partner's physical attractiveness to be a function of positive and negative interactions. These studies provided support for IAT and the idea that perceptions of physical attractiveness can be changed by social interaction.
引用
收藏
页码:8 / 40
页数:33
相关论文
共 63 条
[1]  
Ajzen I, 1985, ACTION CONTROL COGNI, P11, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-69746-3_2
[2]  
[Anonymous], COGNITION CLOSE RELA
[3]   Imagining romance: Young people's cultural models of romance and love [J].
Bachen, CM ;
Illouz, E .
CRITICAL STUDIES IN MASS COMMUNICATION, 1996, 13 (04) :279-308
[4]  
Bakeman R., 1986, OBSERVING INTERACTIO
[5]   RELATIONAL SCHEMAS AND THE PROCESSING OF SOCIAL INFORMATION [J].
BALDWIN, MW .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1992, 112 (03) :461-484
[6]  
Baxter L.A., 1996, Relating: Dialogues and dialectics
[7]  
Bem D.J., 1972, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, V6, P1
[8]   PHYSICAL ATTRACTIVENESS AND DATING CHOICE - TEST OF MATCHING HYPOTHESIS [J].
BERSCHEID, E ;
DION, K ;
WALSTER, E ;
WALSTER, GW .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1971, 7 (02) :173-+
[9]  
Berscheid E., 1974, ADV EXP SOC PSYCHOL, V7, P157, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60037-4
[10]   EFFECTS OF COMMUNICATION EXPECTANCIES, ACTUAL COMMUNICATION, AND EXPECTANCY DISCONFIRMATION ON EVALUATIONS OF COMMUNICATORS AND THEIR COMMUNICATION BEHAVIOR [J].
BURGOON, JK ;
LEPOIRE, BA .
HUMAN COMMUNICATION RESEARCH, 1993, 20 (01) :67-96