Mixed biodiversity benefits of agri-environment schemes in five European countries

被引:746
作者
Kleijn, D
Baquero, RA
Clough, Y
Díaz, M
De Esteban, J
Fernández, F
Gabriel, D
Herzog, F
Holzschuh, A
Jöhl, R
Knop, E
Kruess, A
Marshall, EJP
Steffan-Dewenter, I
Tscharntke, T
Verhulst, J
West, TM
Yela, JL
机构
[1] Wageningen Univ, Nature Conservat & Plant Ecol Grp, NL-6708 PD Wageningen, Netherlands
[2] Univ Castilla La Mancha, Fac Ciencias Medio Ambiente, Dept Ciencies Ambientales, E-45071 Toledo, Spain
[3] Univ Gottingen, Dept Agroecol, D-37073 Gottingen, Germany
[4] Swiss Fed Res Stn Agroecol & Agr, Agroscope FAL Reckenholz, CH-8046 Zurich, Switzerland
[5] Marshall Agroecol Ltd, Winscombe BS25 1DU, Somerset, England
关键词
biodiversity conservation; European Union; farmland wildlife; land-use intensity; policy evaluation; Red Data Book species;
D O I
10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00869.x
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Agri-environment schemes are an increasingly important tool for the maintenance and restoration of farmland biodiversity in Europe but their ecological effects are poorly known. Scheme design is partly based on non-ecological considerations and poses important restrictions on evaluation studies. We describe a robust approach to evaluate agri-environment schemes and use it to evaluate the biodiversity effects of agri-environment schemes in five European countries. We compared species density of vascular plants, birds, bees, grasshoppers and crickets, and spiders on 202 paired fields, one with an agri-environment scheme, the other conventionally managed. In all countries, agri-environment schemes had marginal to moderately positive effects on biodiversity. However, uncommon species benefited in only two of five countries and species listed in Red Data Books rarely benefited from agri-environment schemes. Scheme objectives may need to differentiate between biodiversity of common species that can be enhanced with relatively simple modifications in farming practices and diversity or abundance of endangered species which require more elaborate conservation measures.
引用
收藏
页码:243 / 254
页数:12
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]  
Aebischer NJ, 2000, ECOLOGY AND CONSERVATION OF LOWLAND FARMLAND BIRDS, P43
[2]  
[Anonymous], AGR MEAS OV GEN PRIN
[3]   Conservation of the Montagu's harrier (Circus pygargus) in agricultural areas [J].
Arroyo, B ;
García, JT ;
Bretagnolle, V .
ANIMAL CONSERVATION, 2002, 5 :283-290
[4]  
BANASZAK J, 1980, Polish Ecological Studies, V6, P355
[5]   Linking agricultural practice to insect and bird populations: a historical study over three decades [J].
Benton, TG ;
Bryant, DM ;
Cole, L ;
Crick, HQP .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2002, 39 (04) :673-687
[6]  
Berendse F, 2004, AMBIO, V33, P499, DOI 10.1639/0044-7447(2004)033[0499:DBIALA]2.0.CO
[7]  
2
[8]  
Bibby C.J., 1992, BIRD CENSUS TECHNIQU
[9]   Is dispersal distance of birds proportional to territory size? [J].
Bowman, J .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE ZOOLOGIE, 2003, 81 (02) :195-202
[10]   Five-year evaluation of the impact of the Arable Stewardship Pilot Scheme on birds [J].
Bradbury, RB ;
Browne, SJ ;
Stevens, DK ;
Aebischer, NJ .
IBIS, 2004, 146 :171-180