Conflicting phylogenies of balsaminoid families and the polytomy in Ericales:: combining data in a Bayesian framework

被引:43
作者
Geuten, K
Smets, E
Schols, P
Yuan, YM
Janssens, S
Küpfer, P
Pyck, N
机构
[1] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Inst Bot & Microbiol, Lab Plant Systemat, B-3001 Heverlee, Belgium
[2] Univ Neuchatel, Inst Bot, Neuchatel, Switzerland
关键词
Ericales; Balsaminaceae; Marcgraviaceae; Tetrameristaceae; Bayesian inference; combining data; akaike weights; model selection; hierarchical model;
D O I
10.1016/j.ympev.2003.09.014
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The balsaminoid Ericales, namely Balsaminaceae, Marcgraviaceae, Tetrameristaceae, and Pellicieraceae have been confidently placed at the base of Ericales, but the relations among these families have been resolved differently in recent analyses. Sister to this basal group is a large polytomy comprising all other families of Ericales, which is associated with short internodes. Because there are more than 13 kb of sequences for a large sampling of representatives, a thorough examination of the available data with novel methods seemed in place. Because of its computational speed, Bayesian phylogenetics allows for the use of parameter-rich models that can accommodate differences in the evolutionary process between partitions in a simultaneous analysis. In addition, there are recently proposed Bayesian strategies of assessing incongruence between partitions. We have applied these methods to the current problems in Ericales phylogeny, taking into account reported pitfalls in Bayesian analysis such as model selection uncertainty. Based on our results we infer several, previously unresolved relationships in the order Ericales. In balsaminoid families, we find that the closest relatives of Balsaminaceae are Marcgraviaceae. In the Ericales polytomy, we find strong support for Pentaphylacaceae sensu APG II as the sister group of Maesaceae. In addition, Symplocaceae receive a position as sister to Theaceae and these families form a monophyletic group together with Styracaceae-Diapensiaceae. At the base of this clade are Actinidiaceae and Clethraceae. The positions of Ebenaceae and Lecythidaceae remain uncertain. (C) 2003 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:711 / 729
页数:19
相关论文
共 97 条
[1]  
Airy-Shaw H. K., 1966, DICT FLOWERING PLANT
[2]   Phylogenetic analysis of asterids based on sequences of four genes [J].
Albach, DC ;
Soltis, PS ;
Soltis, DE ;
Olmstead, RG .
ANNALS OF THE MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN, 2001, 88 (02) :163-212
[3]  
Albert V. A., 1998, MOL SYSTEMATICS PLAN, P349
[4]   Bayes or bootstrap? A simulation study comparing the performance of Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling and bootstrapping in assessing phylogenetic confidence [J].
Alfaro, ME ;
Zoller, S ;
Lutzoni, F .
MOLECULAR BIOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2003, 20 (02) :255-266
[5]   Maesaceae, a new primuloid family in the order Ericales s.l. [J].
Anderberg, AA ;
Ståhl, B ;
Källersjö, M .
TAXON, 2000, 49 (02) :183-187
[6]   Phylogenetic relationships in the order Ericales SL:: Analyses of molecular data from five genes from the plastid and mitochondrial genomes [J].
Anderberg, AA ;
Rydin, C ;
Källersjö, M .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY, 2002, 89 (04) :677-687
[7]  
BARETTAKUIPERS T, 1976, LEIDEN BOT SER, V3, P76
[8]  
Berry P. E., 2001, Kew Bulletin, V56, P725, DOI 10.2307/4117702
[9]   Bayesian model adequacy and choice in phylogenetics [J].
Bollback, JP .
MOLECULAR BIOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2002, 19 (07) :1171-1180
[10]   Phylogenetics of asterids based on 3 coding and 3 non-coding chloroplast DNA markers and the utility of non-coding DNA at higher taxonomic levels [J].
Bremer, B ;
Bremer, K ;
Heidari, N ;
Erixon, P ;
Olmstead, RG ;
Anderberg, AA ;
Källersjö, M ;
Barkhordarian, E .
MOLECULAR PHYLOGENETICS AND EVOLUTION, 2002, 24 (02) :274-301