The effect of watershed scale on HEC-HMS calibrated parameters: a case study in the Clear Creek watershed in Iowa, US

被引:43
作者
Zhang, H. L. [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Y. J. [1 ]
Wang, Y. Q. [1 ]
Li, D. X. [2 ]
Wang, X. K. [2 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Forestry Univ, Key Lab Soil & Water Conservat & Desertificat Com, Minist Educ, Sch Soil & Water Conservat, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
[2] Tsinghua Univ, State Key Lab Hydrosci & Engn, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
关键词
UNCERTAINTY ASSESSMENT; MODEL; OPTIMIZATION; SUBDIVISION; SIMULATION;
D O I
10.5194/hess-17-2735-2013
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
In this paper, we use the Hydrologic Modeling System (HEC-HMS) to simulate two flood events to investigate the effect of watershed subdivision in terms of performance, the calibrated parameter values, the description of hydrologic processes, and the subsequent interpretation of water balance components. We use Stage IV hourly NEXRAD precipitation as the meteorological input for ten model configurations with variable sub-basin sizes. Model parameters are automatically optimized to fit the observed data. The strategy is implemented in Clear Creek Watershed (CCW), which is located in the upper Mississippi River basin. Results show that most of the calibrated parameter values are sensitive to the basin partition scheme and that the relative relevance of physical processes, described by the model, change depending on watershed subdivision. In particular, our results show that parameters derived from different model implementations attribute losses in the system to completely different physical phenomena without a notable effect on the model's performance. Our work adds to the body of evidence demonstrating that automatically calibrated parameters in hydrological models can lead to an incorrect prescription of the internal dynamics of runoff production and transport. Furthermore, it demonstrates that model implementation adds a new dimension to the problem of non-uniqueness in hydrological models.
引用
收藏
页码:2735 / 2745
页数:11
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
Ao TQ, 2003, IAHS-AISH PUBL, P1
[2]  
Chen F, 2011, FUJ CHIN GEOINF 19 I, P1
[3]   Applying Particle Swarm Optimization to Parameter Estimation of the Nonlinear Muskingum Model [J].
Chu, Hone-Jay ;
Chang, Liang-Cheng .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING, 2009, 14 (09) :1024-1027
[4]  
Cleveland T.G., 2009, World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2009: Great Rivers, P6527, DOI DOI 10.1061/41036(342)661
[5]  
Cunge JA., 1969, J HYDRAUL RES, V7, P205, DOI [10.1080/00221686909500264, DOI 10.1080/00221686909500264]
[6]   Effect of Aggregation of On-Site Storm-Water Control Devices in an Urban Catchment Model [J].
Elliott, Alexander H. ;
Trowsdale, Sam A. ;
Wadhwa, Sanjay .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING, 2009, 14 (09) :975-983
[7]  
Gan TY, 1996, WATER RESOUR RES, V32, P3513, DOI 10.1029/96WR02195
[8]  
Ghosh I, 2011, J HYDROL EN IN PRESS
[9]  
Hydrology National Engineering Handbook, 2007, HYDR NAT ENG HDB
[10]   Effect of watershed subdivision on swat flow, sediment, and nutrient predictions [J].
Jha, M ;
Gassman, PW ;
Secchi, S ;
Gu, R ;
Arnold, J .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION, 2004, 40 (03) :811-825