Transformative impact of Magnet designation: England case study

被引:63
作者
Aiken, Linda H. [1 ]
Buchan, James [2 ]
Ball, Jane
Rafferty, Anne Marie [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Ctr Hlth Outcomes & Policy Res, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[2] Queen Margaret Univ Coll, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
[3] Nursing Kings Coll, Florence Nightingale Sch, London, England
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Magnet hospitals; nurses; nursing; UK;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02640.x
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
To test the impact of the implementation of Magnet principles of improving nurses' work environments. Magnet hospital designation developed in the USA in the 1980s to recognise hospitals that had created excellent patient care environments and supported the professional practice of nursing. A pilot initiative in England was the first test of the applicability of Magnet standards outside the USA. Research methods included surveys of nurses in the demonstration hospital in a predesign and postdesign and comparisons to survey results of nurses practicing in a national sample of 30 National Health Service Trusts. Prior to beginning the Magnet journey, the demonstration hospital had a nurse work environment that was somewhat less positive than the national sample NHS hospitals. Nurses practicing in the demonstration hospital were somewhat less satisfied with their jobs than nurses in other NHS hospitals. Following a two-year period during which the evidence-based Magnet standards were implemented and Magnet Designation was awarded, the quality of the nurse practice environment had improved significantly, as had job satisfaction of nurses and their appraisals of the quality of patient care. The quality of the nurse practice environment after Magnet designation was better than that of a national sample of NHS trusts. Improved nurse outcomes were because of the improved practice environment rather than staffing enhancements. Implementation of the Magnet hospital intervention was associated with a significantly improved nursing work environment as well as improved job-related outcomes for nurses and markers for quality of patient care. Nurses can use Magnet principles to improve the quality of their work environments.
引用
收藏
页码:3330 / 3337
页数:8
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [1] Aiken L H, 2001, J Health Hum Serv Adm, V23, P416
  • [2] LOWER MEDICARE MORTALITY AMONG A SET OF HOSPITALS KNOWN FOR GOOD NURSING-CARE
    AIKEN, LH
    SMITH, HL
    LAKE, ET
    [J]. MEDICAL CARE, 1994, 32 (08) : 771 - 787
  • [3] Organization and outcomes of inpatient AIDS care
    Aiken, LH
    Sloane, DM
    Lake, ET
    Sochalski, J
    Weber, AL
    [J]. MEDICAL CARE, 1999, 37 (08) : 760 - 772
  • [4] Hospital staffing, organization, and quality of care: cross-national findings
    Aiken, LH
    Clarke, SP
    Sloane, DM
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 2002, 14 (01) : 5 - 13
  • [5] Nurses' reports on hospital care in five countries
    Aiken, LH
    Clarke, SP
    Sloane, DM
    Sochalski, JA
    Busse, R
    Clarke, H
    Giovannetti, P
    Hunt, J
    Rafferty, AM
    Shamian, J
    [J]. HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2001, 20 (03) : 43 - 53
  • [6] The magnet nursing services recognition program -: A comparison of two groups of magnet hospitals
    Aiken, LH
    Havens, DS
    Sloane, DM
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NURSING, 2000, 100 (03) : 26 - 35
  • [7] Hospital nurse staffing and patient mortality, nurse burnout, and job dissatisfaction
    Aiken, LH
    Clarke, SP
    Sloane, DM
    Sochalski, J
    Silber, JH
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2002, 288 (16): : 1987 - 1993
  • [8] Measuring organizational traits of hospitals: The revised nursing work index
    Aiken, LH
    Patrician, PA
    [J]. NURSING RESEARCH, 2000, 49 (03) : 146 - 153
  • [9] Aiken LH, 2002, MAGNET HOSP REVISITE, P61
  • [10] AIKEN LH, 2006, REFLECTIONS NURSING, V31, P16