Effects of soil dust episodes and mixed fuel sources on source apportionment of PM10 particles in Kuopio, Finland

被引:51
作者
Hosiokangas, J
Ruuskanen, J
Pekkanen, J
机构
[1] Natl Publ Hlth Inst, Environm Epidemiol Unit, FIN-70701 Kuopio, Finland
[2] Univ Kuopio, Dept Environm Sci, FIN-70211 Kuopio, Finland
关键词
receptor modeling; FA-MLR; dust episode; particulate matter; PM10;
D O I
10.1016/S1352-2310(98)00400-2
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
A receptor modeling study was carried out in Kuopio, Finland, between January and April 1994. Near the center of town, the daily mean concentrations were measured for PM10, sulphur dioxide, carbon monoxide and Black Smoke. Elemental concentrations of PM10 samples for 38 days were analyzed by ICP-MS. The main sources and their contributions to the measured concentrations of PM10 particles were solved by receptor modeling using a factor analysis-multiple linear regression (FA-MLR) model. Because a dust episode was very strong during two sampling days, the FA analysis was strongly influenced by this episode and did not give main factors. The factor analysis, when the two episode days were omitted, gave credible factors related to the sources in the study area. The four major sources and their estimated contributions to the average PM10 concentration of 27.2 mu g m(-3) were: soil and street dust 46-48%, heavy fuel oil burning 12-18%, traffic exhaust 10-14%, wood burning ca. 11% and unidentified sources 15-25%. However, during spring dust episode days, with maximum PM10 concentration of 150 mu g m(-3), the main source of PM10 was soil. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:3821 / 3829
页数:9
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
BRUNEKREEF B, 1993, EFFECTS SHORT TERM C
[2]   RECEPTOR MODELS [J].
GORDON, GE .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 1988, 22 (10) :1132-1142
[3]  
HANNINEN O, 1992, EMISSION INVENTORY A
[4]   CURRENT FACTOR-ANALYSIS RECEPTOR MODELS ARE ILL-POSED [J].
HENRY, RC .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 1987, 21 (08) :1815-1820
[5]   REVIEW OF RECEPTOR MODEL FUNDAMENTALS [J].
HENRY, RC ;
LEWIS, CW ;
HOPKE, PK ;
WILLIAMSON, HJ .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 1984, 18 (08) :1507-1515
[6]  
Hopke P. K., 1991, RECEPTOR MODELING AI
[7]   EMISSIONS OF TRACE-ELEMENTS FROM MOTOR-VEHICLES - POTENTIAL MARKER ELEMENTS AND SOURCE COMPOSITION PROFILE [J].
HUANG, XD ;
OLMEZ, I ;
ARAS, NK ;
GORDON, GE .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 1994, 28 (08) :1385-1391
[8]   THE EFFECTS OF NUMBER OF SAMPLES AND RANDOM ERROR ON THE FACTOR-ANALYSIS MULTIPLE-REGRESSION (FA MR) RECEPTOR MODELING TECHNIQUE [J].
ITO, K ;
KNEIP, TJ ;
LIOY, PJ .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 1986, 20 (07) :1433-1440
[9]   IDENTIFYING AND ESTIMATING THE RELATIVE IMPORTANCE OF SOURCES OF AIRBORNE-PARTICULATES [J].
KLEINMAN, MT ;
PASTERNACK, BS ;
EISENBUD, M ;
KNEIP, TJ .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 1980, 14 (01) :62-65
[10]   RECEPTOR MODELING STUDY OF DENVER WINTER HAZE [J].
LEWIS, CW ;
BAUMGARDNER, RE ;
STEVENS, RK ;
RUSSWURM, GM .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 1986, 20 (11) :1126-1136