The effects of metacognition and email interactions on learning graphing

被引:16
作者
Kramarski, B [1 ]
Ritkof, R [1 ]
机构
[1] Bar Ilan Univ, Sch Educ, IL-52900 Ramat Gan, Israel
关键词
comparative study; email; graphs; interaction; mathematics; metacognition; school;
D O I
10.1046/j.0266-4909.2001.00205.x
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study was twofold: First, to investigate the effects of metacognition and email interaction between teacher-student on learning to interpret and construct graphs. Second, to describe the email interaction on three levels of interaction: tutorial, metacognitive and life. Participants were 50 ninth-grade students (boys and girls) who studied graphs in two classes. One class (n = 25) was exposed to EXCEL software embedded within email interaction (EMAIL) and the other class (n = 25) was exposed to EXCEL software embedded within email interaction and metacognitive instruction (EMAIL + META). Results indicated that the EMAIL + META students significantly outperformed the EMAIL students on graph interpretation and graph construction. In particular the effects were observed on students' ability to explain mathematical reasoning and on reducing misconceptions regarding graphs. Furthermore, qualitative analysis of the EMAIL messages indicated that the EMAIL META students frequently used different levels of interaction in their email interactions than the EMAIL students.
引用
收藏
页码:33 / 43
页数:11
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], J RES MATH ED MONOGR
[2]  
DEAUDELIN C, 1999, 8 EARLI C GOT SWED
[3]  
Harri-Augstein E., 1991, LEARNING CONVERSATIO
[4]  
HILTZ SR, 1988, COMP SUPP COOP WORK
[5]  
Kramarski B., 2001, Educational Media International, V38, P77, DOI 10.1080/09523980110041458
[6]   Cognitive-metacognitive training within a problem-solving based Logo environment [J].
Kramarski, B ;
Mevarech, ZR .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1997, 67 :425-445
[7]   Effects of multilevel versus unilevel metacognitive training on mathematical reasoning [J].
Kramarski, B ;
Mevarech, ZR ;
Lieberman, A .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, 2001, 94 (05) :292-300
[8]  
Kramarski B, 2000, P 24 C INT GROUP PSY, P167
[9]  
KRAMARSKI B, 1999, ED MEDIA INT, V36, P203, DOI DOI 10.1080/0952398990360306
[10]  
KRAMARSKI B, IN PRESS AM ED RES J