Prognostication of environmental indices in potato production using artificial neural networks

被引:67
作者
Khoshnevisan, Benyamin [1 ]
Rafiee, Shahin [1 ]
Omid, Mahmoud [1 ]
Mousazadeh, Hossein [1 ]
Sefeedpari, Paria [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tehran, Fac Agr Engn & Technol, Dept Agr Machinery Engn, Karaj, Iran
关键词
Artificial neural network; Potato; LCA; Environmental indices; Prediction; Modeling; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION; ENERGY USE; ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY; SENSITIVITY-ANALYSIS; IMPACT ASSESSMENT; CROP PRODUCTION; WINTER-WHEAT; SUGAR-BEET; EMISSIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.03.028
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
083001 [环境科学];
摘要
Artificial Neural Network (ANN) is an appropriate tool for forecasting the non-linear relationships across many scientific studies. In this study a back-propagation (BP) learning algorithm was chosen to predict the environmental indices of potato production in Iran. Data were collected randomly from 260 farms in Fereydonshahr city, located in Esfahan province by face to face questionnaire method. Initially, Life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology was developed to assess all the environmental impacts associated with potato cultivation in the studied region. The six LCA indices including global warming potential (GWP), eutrophication potential (EP), human toxicity potential (HTP), terrestrial ecotoxicity potential (TEP), oxidant formation potential (OFP) and acidification potential (AP) were selected as target outputs. Farm gate and one tone of potato produced were chosen as system boundary and functional unit. To find the best topology, several ANN models with different number of hidden layers and neurons in each layer were developed. To assess the best performance, a topology with highest coefficient of determination (R-2), lowest root mean square error (RMSE) and mean absolute error (MAE) was selected as optimum architecture. Accordingly, ANN model with 11-10-6 structure showed the best performance. RMSE for GWP, HTP, EP, OFP, AP and TEP was computed as 0.037, 0.005, 0.057, 0.032, 0.048 and 0.037, respectively. Also, MAEs for this model were calculated as 0.028, 0.001, 0.039, 0.022, 0.035 and 0.027 for GWP, HIP, EP, OFP, AP and TEP, respectively. Evaluation of the results revealed that the developed ANN model (11-10-6 architecture) appears to be appropriate tool in predicting environmental indices of potato production. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:402 / 409
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]
Life cycle assessment of bean production in the Prespa National Park, Greece [J].
Abeliotis, Konstadinos ;
Detsis, Vassilis ;
Pappia, Christina .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2013, 41 :89-96
[2]
[Anonymous], EC DAT
[3]
[Anonymous], 2011, NEUR EXC
[4]
[Anonymous], 2007, ECOINVENT REP VERSIO
[5]
Resource consumption and emissions from olive oil production: a life cycle inventory case study in Cyprus [J].
Avraamides, M. ;
Fatta, D. .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2008, 16 (07) :809-821
[6]
Life cycle assessment of Italian citrus-based products. Sensitivity analysis and improvement scenarios [J].
Beccali, Marco ;
Cellura, Maurizio ;
Iudicello, Maria ;
Mistretta, Marina .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2010, 91 (07) :1415-1428
[7]
Environmental impact assessment of agricultural production systems using the life cycle assessment methodology -: I.: Theoretical concept of a LCA method tailored to crop production [J].
Brentrup, F ;
Küsters, J ;
Kuhlmann, H ;
Lammel, J .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY, 2004, 20 (03) :247-264
[8]
Environmental impact assessment of agricultural production systems using the life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology -: II.: The application to N fertilizer use in winter wheat production systems [J].
Brentrup, F ;
Küsters, J ;
Lammel, J ;
Barraclough, P ;
Kuhlmann, H .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY, 2004, 20 (03) :265-279
[9]
Application of the Life Cycle Assessment methodology to agricultural production:: an example of sugar beet production with different forms of nitrogen fertilisers [J].
Brentrup, F ;
Küsters, J ;
Kuhlmann, H ;
Lammel, J .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY, 2001, 14 (03) :221-233
[10]
BRENTRUP F, 2003, LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMEN