Measuring countries' cooperation within the international climate change regime

被引:25
作者
Baettig, Michele B. [1 ]
Brander, Simone [1 ]
Imboden, Dieter M. [1 ]
机构
[1] ETH, Inst Biogeochem & Pulltant Dynam, CHN E24, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
international cooperation; UNFCCC; Kyoto Protocol; CO2; emissions; climate change regime; climate policy;
D O I
10.1016/j.envsci.2008.04.003
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
We present a method how to estimate and compare the cooperative behavior of countries within the international climate change regime. Two indicators measure whether and how fast countries have committed to the United Nations Framework on Climate Change (UNFCCC) and the Kyoto Protocol (KP). Three additional indicators quantify whether and how effectively measures have been implemented in line with these agreements. These three measures are reporting, financial contributions, and development of per capita CO2 emissions in relation to the per capita gross domestic product of each country. Results show that developed countries with emission targets under the KP ratified the protocol more often and faster, submitted their report timelier, and paid their annual financial contributions to the UNFCCC secretariat more regularly than the other countries. However, concerning CO2 emissions, developing countries are evaluated more positively than developed countries. The five indicators are aggregated to a 'Cooperation Index' that evaluates 198 countries' cooperative behavior within the international climate regime on a scale between 0 (=least cooperative) and 6 (=most cooperative). According to this Cooperation Index, the following large countries are ranked after their level of cooperation in ascending order: United States of America, Australia, Russia, Canada, Brazil, China, India, South Africa, and large European countries. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:478 / 489
页数:12
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   A dynamic approach to the Environmental Kuznets Curve hypothesis [J].
Agras, J ;
Chapman, D .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 1999, 28 (02) :267-277
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1992, UN FRAMEWORK CONVENT
[3]   A climate change index: Where climate change may be most prominent in the 21st century [J].
Baettig, Michele B. ;
Wild, Martin ;
Imboden, Dieter M. .
GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2007, 34 (01)
[4]  
Barrett Scott, 2003, INT ENVIRON AGREEM-P, V3, P349, DOI [DOI 10.1023/B:INEA.0000005767.67689.28, 10.1023/B:INEA.0000005767.67689.28]
[5]  
Baumert K.A., 2005, NAVIGATING NUMBERS G
[6]   Is the good news about compliance good news about cooperation? [J].
Downs, GW ;
Rocke, DM ;
Barsoom, PN .
INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION, 1996, 50 (03) :379-&
[7]  
Esty D.C., 2006, PILOT 2006 ENV PERFO
[8]   Ratification of the 1992 climate change convention: What determines legislative delay? [J].
Fredriksson, PG ;
Gaston, N .
PUBLIC CHOICE, 2000, 104 (3-4) :345-368
[9]  
Freudenberg M., 2003, DSTIDOC200316 OECD
[10]   Desperately seeking environmental Kuznets [J].
Galeotti, M ;
Lanza, A .
ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2005, 20 (11) :1379-1388