Growth, competition, yields advantage and economics in soybean/pigeonpea intercropping system in semi-arid tropics of India - II. Effect of nutrient management

被引:46
作者
Ghosh, PK [1 ]
Mohanty, A [1 ]
Bandyopadhyay, KK [1 ]
Painuli, DK [1 ]
Misra, AK [1 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Soil Sci, Bhopal 462038, India
关键词
competition; energy use; intercropping; nutrient management; relative yield; relative nitrogen yield; relative phosphorus yield;
D O I
10.1016/j.fcr.2005.05.010
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Low native nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) coupled with imbalanced nutrient application is a major constraint limiting productivity of intercropping systems on Vertisols of the semi-arid tropical India. In a 3-year field experiment competition behaviour of component crops for nutrients use in soybean/pigeonpea intercropping system was assessed based on relative yield (RY), relative nitrogen yield (RNY) and relative phosphorus yield (RPY) under three nutrient levels (0 NPK, 100% NPK (N:P:K = 30:26:25 kg ha(-1)) and 100% NPK + 4 t FYM ha(-1)). The result showed that before soybean harvest, the RY and RNY of soybean were greater (1.0) than the corresponding values of RY and RNY of pigeon pea (0.6). This implied that competition exists for soil N between the component crops during the first half of the cropping system. It was observed that soybean harvest did not coincide with peak flowering of pigeonpea, the stage when biological nitrogen fixation (BNF) was maximum. Thus, BNF dependency of pigeonpea was low before soybean harvest and the plants suffered from N deficiency more when no fertilizer-N was applied and diminished at a high-N level. Pigeon pea attained its peak flowering after the harvest of soybean and increased its dependency on BNF when soil N was exhausted by soybean. Thus, after the harvest of soybean, RY and RNY of pigeon pea gradually increased and approached 1.0 at maturity at all nutrient levels. The RPY values showed that phosphorus was not the limiting factor to any of the crop in the system even if it was not applied. The study thus suggests that in the soybean/pigeonpea intercropping system, N is a limiting factor for growth of pigeonpea intercrop during the first half of its growth and application of 100% NPK (30 kg N) + 4 t FYM could meet N demand of pigeonpea in N deficient soils as this nutrient management option gave higher yield, root length density and profit under soybean/pigeonpea intercropping system than 100% NPK and control. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:90 / 97
页数:8
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
ADUGYAMFI JJ, 1993, P ANN M JAP SOC SOIL, V37, P35
[2]  
ADUGYAMFI JJ, 1996, JIRCAS INT AGR SERIE, V3, P453
[3]   PHOSPHORUS UPTAKE BY PIGEON PEA AND ITS ROLE IN CROPPING SYSTEMS OF THE INDIAN SUBCONTINENT [J].
AE, N ;
ARIHARA, J ;
OKADA, K ;
YOSHIHARA, T ;
JOHANSEN, C .
SCIENCE, 1990, 248 (4954) :477-480
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1984, STAT PROCEDURES AGR
[5]  
ARIHARA J, 1991, PHOSPHORUS NUTRITION OF GRAIN LEGUMES IN THE SEMI-ARID TROPICS, P183
[6]   NITROGEN RELATIONSHIPS AND RESIDUAL EFFECTS OF INTERCROPPING SORGHUM WITH LEGUMES [J].
BANDYOPADHYAY, SK ;
DE, R .
JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE, 1986, 107 :629-632
[7]   Comparative effectiveness of cattle manure, poultry manure, phosphocompost and fertilizer-NPK on three cropping systems in vertisols of semi-arid tropics. II. Dry matter yield, nodulation, chlorophyll content and enzyme activity [J].
Ghosh, PK ;
Bandyopadhyay, AKK ;
Manna, MC ;
Mandal, KG ;
Misra, AK ;
Hati, KM .
BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2004, 95 (01) :85-93
[8]   Comparative effectiveness of cattle manure, poultry manure, phosphocompost and fertilizer-NPK on three cropping systems in vertisols of semi-arid tropics. I. Crop yields and system performance [J].
Ghosh, PK ;
Ramesh, P ;
Bandyopadhyay, KK ;
Tripathi, AK ;
Hati, KM ;
Misra, AK ;
Acharya, CL .
BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2004, 95 (01) :77-83
[9]   Growth, yield, competition and economics of groundnut/cereal fodder intercropping systems in the semi-arid tropics of India [J].
Ghosh, PK .
FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 2004, 88 (2-3) :227-237
[10]  
GHOSH PK, 2005, EFFECT SUB SOILING, V2