Structural and Thermodynamic Approach to Peptide Immunogenicity

被引:33
作者
Camacho, Carlos J. [1 ]
Katsumata, Yasuhiro [2 ]
Ascherman, Dana P. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Computat Biol, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA
[2] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Med, Dept Med, Div Rheumatol & Clin Immunol, Pittsburgh, PA USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会; 美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
D O I
10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000231
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
In the conventional paradigm of humoral immunity, B cells recognize their cognate antigen target in its native form. However, it is well known that relatively unstable peptides bearing only partial structural resemblance to the native protein can trigger antibodies recognizing higher-order structures found in the native protein. On the basis of sound thermodynamic principles, this work reveals that stability of immunogenic proteinlike motifs is a critical parameter rationalizing the diverse humoral immune responses induced by different linear peptide epitopes. In this paradigm, peptides with a minimal amount of stability (Delta G(X) < 0 kcal/mol) around a proteinlike motif (X) are capable of inducing antibodies with similar affinity for both peptide and native protein, more weakly stable peptides (Delta G(X) > 0 kcal/mol) trigger antibodies recognizing full protein but not peptide, and unstable peptides (Delta G(X) > 8 kcal/mol) fail to generate antibodies against either peptide or protein. Immunization experiments involving peptides derived from the autoantigen histidyl-tRNA synthetase verify that selected peptides with varying relative stabilities predicted by molecular dynamics simulations induce antibody responses consistent with this theory. Collectively, these studies provide insight pertinent to the structural basis of immunogenicity and, at the same time, validate this form of thermodynamic and molecular modeling as an approach to probe the development/evolution of humoral immune responses.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
Agarwal A, 1997, J IMMUNOL, V159, P1077
[2]  
ATASSI MZ, 1985, CRIT REV IMMUNOL, V5, P387
[3]   CONTINUOUS AND DISCONTINUOUS PROTEIN ANTIGENIC DETERMINANTS [J].
BARLOW, DJ ;
EDWARDS, MS ;
THORNTON, JM .
NATURE, 1986, 322 (6081) :747-748
[4]   Affinity dependence of the B cell response to antigen: A threshold, a ceiling, and the importance of off-rate [J].
Batista, FD ;
Neuberger, MS .
IMMUNITY, 1998, 8 (06) :751-759
[5]   THE ANTIGENIC STRUCTURE OF PROTEINS - A REAPPRAISAL [J].
BENJAMIN, DC ;
BERZOFSKY, JA ;
EAST, IJ ;
GURD, FRN ;
HANNUM, C ;
LEACH, SJ ;
MARGOLIASH, E ;
MICHAEL, JG ;
MILLER, A ;
PRAGER, EM ;
REICHLIN, M ;
SERCARZ, EE ;
SMITHGILL, SJ ;
TODD, PE ;
WILSON, AC .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF IMMUNOLOGY, 1984, 2 :67-101
[6]  
BENKIRANE N, 1993, J BIOL CHEM, V268, P26279
[7]   THE DYNAMIC NATURE OF THE ANTIBODY REPERTOIRE [J].
BEREK, C ;
MILSTEIN, C .
IMMUNOLOGICAL REVIEWS, 1988, 105 :5-26
[8]   Kinetics of desolvation-mediated protein-protein binding [J].
Camacho, CJ ;
Kimura, SR ;
DeLisi, C ;
Vajda, S .
BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2000, 78 (03) :1094-1105
[9]   Protein docking along smooth association pathways [J].
Camacho, CJ ;
Vajda, S .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2001, 98 (19) :10636-10641
[10]   Screening of anti-MUC1 antibodies for reactivity with native (ascites) and recombinant (baculovirus) MUC1 and for blocking MUC1 specific cytotoxic T-lymphocytes [J].
Ciborowski, P ;
Konitzki, WM ;
Blander, JM ;
Finn, OJ .
TUMOR BIOLOGY, 1998, 19 :147-151