Functional diversity of soil bacteria as affected by management practices and phenological stage of Phaseolus vulgaris

被引:27
作者
Papatheodorou, E. M. [1 ]
Efthimiadou, E. [1 ]
Stamou, G. P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Aristotle Univ Thessaloniki, Sch Biol, Dept Ecol, Thessaloniki 54124, Greece
关键词
BIOLOG; conventional vs organic farming; Phaseolus vulgaris; kinetic parameters; chemical inputs;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejsobi.2008.06.002
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
This study focused on the effect of management regime and crop developmental stage on soil bacterial functional diversity by using GN Biolog plates. The fields examined were: a grazed grassland (Gr), 2 conventional cultivations differing in the amount and the quality of chemical inputs (C-1 and C-2) and 5 fields cultivated organically for 14, 10, 8, 5 and 2 years respectively. All agricultural lands were cultivated with Phaseolus vulgaris L. Sampling was conducted at seedling emergence, in the mid-growth and after harvest. Low values of diversity were recorded in grassland and conventional fields with the lowest ones in C-2 field. in organic fields, diversity was not related to the age of organic cultivation. However, despite diversity similarities a gradual evolution in community functionality was recorded that parallel changes in the rate of substrate consumption. Increased catabolic activity and diversity followed by changes in the composition of consumed wells occurred in the middle of the phaseolus growth period. Finally, the effect on catabolic profiles of crop developmental stage in conjunction with seasonally varying abiotic conditions was of greater magnitude than that of management regime. The temporal changes in bacterial functionality were totally absent at the C-2 field. (C) 2008 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:429 / 436
页数:8
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
ATIERI MA, 1999, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V74, P19
[2]  
Ayansina ADV, 2006, AFR J BIOTECHNOL, V5, P129
[3]   The application of the herbicide bromoxynil to a model soil-derived bacterial community: impact on degradation and community structure [J].
Baxter, J. ;
Cummings, S. P. .
LETTERS IN APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY, 2006, 43 (06) :659-665
[4]   Microbial and biochemical soil quality indicators and their potential for differentiating areas under contrasting agricultural management regimes [J].
Bending, GD ;
Turner, MK ;
Rayns, F ;
Marx, MC ;
Wood, M .
SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY, 2004, 36 (11) :1785-1792
[5]   Relationship between plants and soil microbial communities in fertilized grasslands [J].
Benizri, E ;
Amiaud, B .
SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY, 2005, 37 (11) :2055-2064
[6]   Determinants of soil microbial communities: Effects of agricultural management, season, and soil type on phospholipid fatty acid profiles [J].
Bossio, DA ;
Scow, KM ;
Gunapala, N ;
Graham, KJ .
MICROBIAL ECOLOGY, 1998, 36 (01) :1-12
[7]   Restoration and canopy type influence soil microflora in a ponderosa pine forest [J].
Boyle, SI ;
Hart, SC ;
Kaye, JP ;
Waldrop, MP .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 2005, 69 (05) :1627-1638
[8]   Microbial and soil parameters in relation to N mineralization in soils of diverse genesis under differing management systems [J].
Burket, JZ ;
Dick, RP .
BIOLOGY AND FERTILITY OF SOILS, 1998, 27 (04) :430-438
[9]   Comparison of substrate utilization assay and fatty acid analysis of soil microbial communities [J].
Buyer, JS ;
Drinkwater, LE .
JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGICAL METHODS, 1997, 30 (01) :3-11
[10]   Effects of soil moisture and plant interactions on the soil microbial community structure [J].
Chen, M. -M. ;
Zhu, Y. -G. ;
Su, Y. -H. ;
Chen, B. -D. ;
Fu, B. -J. ;
Marschner, P. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOIL BIOLOGY, 2007, 43 (01) :31-38