Does double-blind review benefit female authors?

被引：64

作者：

Webb, Thomas J. ^{[1
]}

O'Hara, Bob ^{[2
]}

Freckleton, Robert P. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Sheffield, Dept Anim & Plant Sci, Sheffield S10 2TN, S Yorkshire, England

[2] Univ Helsinki, Dept Math & Stat, FIN-00014 Helsinki, Finland

来源：

TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION | 2008年 / 23卷 / 07期

关键词：

D O I：

10.1016/j.tree.2008.03.003

中图分类号：

Q14 [生态学（生物生态学）];

学科分类号：

071012 ; 0713 ;

摘要：

引用

页码：351 / 353

页数：3

共 11 条

[1] Best tests for candidates [J].

不详 .

NATURE, 2008, 451 (7179) :605-605

[2]

[Anonymous], B BRIT ECOLOGICAL SO

[3]

Bates D., 2005, R NEWS, V5, P27, DOI DOI 10.1159/000323281

[4]

Bentley JT., 2003, Gender differences in the careers of academic scientists and engineers: A literature review: National Science Foundation

[5]

BLANK RM, 1991, AM ECON REV, V81, P1041

[6] Double-blind review favours increased representation of female authors [J].

Budden, Amber E. ;

Tregenza, Tom ;

Aarssen, Lonnie W. ;

Koricheva, Julia ;

Leimu, Roosa ;

Lortie, Christopher J. .

TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2008, 23 (01) :4-6

[7]

Ceci S.J., 2007, WHY ARENT MORE WOMEN

[8]

Greenfield S., 2002, SET fair: A Report on Women in Science, Engineering and Technology from the Baroness Greenfield CBE to the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry

[9]

Monkman M, 2008, PEER REV SCHOLARLY J

[10]

R Core Team, 2016, R LANG ENV STAT COMP

← 1 2 →