A review and meta-analysis of prospective trials comparing different catheters used for embryo transfer

被引:55
作者
Buckett, WM [1 ]
机构
[1] McGill Univ, Royal Victoria Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Montreal, PQ H3A 1A1, Canada
关键词
embryo transfer catheter; IVF-ET; catheter type; meta-analysis;
D O I
10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.08.031
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 [妇产科学];
摘要
Objective: To determine the relative efficacy of different types of embryo transfer (ET) catheters. Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective randomized, controlled trials comparing at least two different ET catheters. Setting: Infertility centers providing treatment with in vitro fertilization/embryo transfer (IVF-ET). Patient(s): Women undergoing ET. Intervention(S): Embryo transfer with soft or hard catheters. Main Outcome Measure(s): Clinical pregnancy rate. Result(s): A total of seven prospective trials were identified that compared soft (Cook or Wallace) catheters with hard (TDT, Frydman, Tomcat, Rocket) catheters. The meta-analysis demonstrated an increased chance of clinical pregnancy when soft ET catheters were used. The TDT catheter was compared against both soft catheters and other hard catheters, showing decreased chance of clinical pregnancy when the TDT catheter was used. Six more prospective, trials were identified comparing the Cook and,Wallace soft catheters, and the meta-analvsis of these data showed no demonstrable difference in clinical pregnancy,rates. Conclusion(s): An increased chance of clinical pregnancy is achieved when soft ET catheters are used. There appears to be little difference between the, Cook and Wallace soft catheters.
引用
收藏
页码:728 / 734
页数:7
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]
TRANSFER OF EMBRYOS INTO THE UTERUS - HOW MUCH DO TECHNICAL FACTORS AFFECT PREGNANCY RATES [J].
ALSHAWAF, T ;
DAVE, R ;
HARPER, J ;
LINEHAN, D ;
RILEY, P ;
CRAFT, I .
JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS, 1993, 10 (01) :31-36
[2]
[3]
Contamination of embryo transfer catheter and treatment outcome in in vitro fertilization [J].
Awonuga, A ;
Nabi, A ;
Govindbhai, J ;
Birch, H ;
Stewart, B .
JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS, 1998, 15 (04) :198-201
[4]
Cook versus Edwards-Wallace: Are there differences in flexible catheters? [J].
Boone, WR ;
Johnson, JE ;
Blackhurst, DM ;
Crane, MM .
JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS, 2001, 18 (01) :15-17
[6]
Predictors of success after embryo transfer: Experience from a single provider [J].
Burke, LM ;
Davenport, AT ;
Russell, GB ;
Deaton, JL .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2000, 182 (05) :1001-1004
[7]
Choe J. K., 2001, Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics and Gynecology, V28, P223
[8]
The effect of ease of transfer and type of catheter used on pregnancy and implantation rates in an IVF program [J].
De Placido, G ;
Wilding, M ;
Strina, I ;
Mollo, A ;
Alviggi, E ;
Tolino, A ;
Colacurci, N ;
De Matteo, L ;
Marino, M ;
Dale, B .
JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS, 2002, 19 (01) :14-18
[9]
FACTORS INFLUENCING PUBLICATION OF RESEARCH RESULTS - FOLLOW-UP OF APPLICATIONS SUBMITTED TO 2 INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARDS [J].
DICKERSIN, K ;
MIN, YI ;
MEINERT, CL .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1992, 267 (03) :374-378
[10]
PUBLICATION BIAS IN CLINICAL RESEARCH [J].
EASTERBROOK, PJ ;
BERLIN, JA ;
GOPALAN, R ;
MATTHEWS, DR .
LANCET, 1991, 337 (8746) :867-872