Multidetector-row helical CT: analysis of time management and workflow

被引:20
作者
Roos, JE [1 ]
Desbiolles, LM [1 ]
Willmann, JK [1 ]
Weishaupt, D [1 ]
Marincek, B [1 ]
Hilfiker, PR [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Zurich Hosp, Inst Diagnost Radiol, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
workflow analysis; time management; multidetector-row helical computed tomography; picture archiving and communication system;
D O I
10.1007/s003300101138
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study was to evaluate time management and workflow for multidetector-row helical CT (MDCT). Time for patient and data handling of at total of 580 patients were evaluated at two different time periods (December 1999. August 2000). each for the following baseline measure me tits: (a) change of clothes/instruction; (b) patient placement on the CT table/i.v. catheter: (c) CT planning and programming: (d) CT data acquisition: (e) CT data reconstruction: (f) CT data storage/printing. All imaging was performed on a Somatom Volume Zoom (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany). Time measurements summarized for different CT protocols revealed the following: (a) 5:01 min (+/-22.06 min); (b) 4:36 min (+/-2.43 min); (c) 4: 11 min (+/-2.55 min) (d) 0:43 min (+/-0.15 min); (e) 6:59 min (+/-2.39 min); (f) 09:51 min (+/-3.51 min). Planning and programming was most time-consuming for CT angiography, whereas chest and abdominal CT needed only 3:26 and 3:30 min, respectively. Reconstruction time was highest for HRCT (9:22 min) and CTA (9:03 min). Data storage/printing was most time-consuming for HRCT (13:02 min), followed by combined neck-chest-abdomen examinations ( 12:19 min). Comparing the two time periods, during which a software update was per-formed, a mean time reduction of 4:31 min per patient (15%, p<0.001) was achieved. Whereas CT data acquisition time is no longer a problem with MDCT, patient management, data reconstruction, and data storage are the most time-consuming parts. Well-trained technicians, state-of-the-art workstations, and fast networking are the most important factors to improve workflow.
引用
收藏
页码:680 / +
页数:6
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]   Continuing quality improvement procedures for a clinical PACS [J].
Andriole, KP ;
Gould, RG ;
Avrin, DE ;
Bazzill, TM ;
Yin, L ;
Arenson, RL .
JOURNAL OF DIGITAL IMAGING, 1998, 11 (03) :111-114
[2]   Impact of digital radiography on clinical workflow and patient satisfaction [J].
Dackiewicz, D ;
Bergsneider, C ;
Piraino, D .
JOURNAL OF DIGITAL IMAGING, 2000, 13 (02) :200-201
[3]   Patient throughput times for orthopedic outpatients in a department of radiology: results of an interdisciplinary quality management program [J].
Hodler, J ;
Strehle, J ;
Schilling, J ;
Zanetti, M ;
Gerber, C .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 1999, 9 (07) :1381-1384
[4]   Time and flow study results before and after installation of a hospital information system and radiology information system and before clinical use of a picture archiving and communication system [J].
Inamura, K ;
Umeda, T ;
Harauchi, H ;
Kondoh, H ;
Hasegawa, T ;
Kozuka, T ;
Takeda, H ;
Inoue, M .
JOURNAL OF DIGITAL IMAGING, 1997, 10 (01) :1-9
[5]   PACS and CR implementation in a level I trauma center emergency department [J].
Junck, KL ;
Berland, LL ;
Bernreuter, WK ;
McEachern, M ;
Grandhi, S ;
Lewey, G .
JOURNAL OF DIGITAL IMAGING, 1998, 11 (03) :159-162
[6]  
Kopecky K K, 1999, Diagn Imaging (San Franc), V21, P36
[7]  
May GA, 2000, J DIGIT IMAGING, V13, P76, DOI 10.1053/jdim.2000.6832
[8]   Performance evaluation of a multi-slice CT system [J].
McCollough, CH ;
Zink, FE .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1999, 26 (11) :2223-2230
[9]   Expectations and solutions for HIS/RIS/PACS dataflow and workflow [J].
Offenmuller, W .
JOURNAL OF DIGITAL IMAGING, 1997, 10 (03) :95-98
[10]  
Redfern RO, 2000, J DIGIT IMAGING, V13, P97, DOI 10.1053/jdim.2000.6837