Dynamic contrast-enhanced CT in suspected lung cancer: quantitative results

被引:19
作者
Harders, S. W. [1 ]
Madsen, H. H. [1 ]
Nellemann, H. M. [1 ]
Rasmussen, T. R. [2 ]
Thygesen, J. [3 ]
Hager, H. [4 ]
Andersen, N. T. [5 ]
Rasmussen, F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Aarhus Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, DK-8000 Aarhus, Denmark
[2] Aarhus Univ Hosp, Dept Pulmonol, DK-8000 Aarhus, Denmark
[3] Aarhus Univ Hosp, Dept Med Engn, DK-8000 Aarhus, Denmark
[4] Aarhus Univ Hosp, Dept Pathol, DK-8000 Aarhus, Denmark
[5] Aarhus Univ, Dept Biostat, Inst Publ Hlth, Aarhus, Denmark
关键词
SOLITARY PULMONARY NODULES; MULTIDETECTOR ROW CT; PERFUSION PARAMETERS; REPRODUCIBILITY; ANGIOGENESIS; CARCINOMA;
D O I
10.1259/bjr.20130257
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
100231 [临床病理学]; 100902 [航空航天医学];
摘要
Objectives: To examine whether dynamic contrast-enhanced CT (DCE-CT) could be used to characterise and safely distinguish between malignant and benign lung tumours in patients with suspected lung cancer. Methods: Using a quantitative approach to DCE-CT, two separate sets of regions of interest (ROIs) in tissues were placed in each tumour: large ROIs over the entire tumour and small ROIs over the maximally perfused parts of the tumour. Using mathematical modelling techniques and dedicated perfusion software, this yielded a plethora of results. Results: First, because of their non-normal distribution, DCE-CT measurements must be analysed using log scale data transformation. Second, there were highly significant differences between large ROI and small ROI measurements (p<0.001). Thus, the ROI method used in a given study should always be specified in advance. Third, neither quantitative parameters (blood flow and blood volume) nor semi-quantitative parameters (peak enhancement) could be used to distinguish between malignant and benign tumours. This was irrespective of the method of quantification used for large ROIs (0.13, p<0.76) and small ROIs (0.084, p<0.31). Fourth, although there were no indications of systematic reproducibility bias, the 95% limits of agreement were so broad that the risk of disagreement between the measurements could affect the clinical use of the measurements. This lack of reproducibility should be addressed. Conclusion and advances in knowledge: A quantitative approach to DCE-CT is not a clinically usable method for characterising lung tumours.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]
MEASUREMENT IN MEDICINE - THE ANALYSIS OF METHOD COMPARISON STUDIES [J].
ALTMAN, DG ;
BLAND, JM .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES D-THE STATISTICIAN, 1983, 32 (03) :307-317
[2]
[Anonymous], 2003, The Statistical Evaluation of Medical Tests for Classification and Prediction
[3]
[Anonymous], 2010, SEER cancer statistics review, 1975-2007
[4]
Measurement error and correlation coefficients [J].
Bland, JM ;
Altman, DG .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1996, 313 (7048) :41-42
[5]
STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[6]
Whole tumour perfusion of peripheral lung carcinoma: evaluation with first-pass CT perfusion imaging at 64-detector row CT [J].
Li, Y. ;
Yang, Z. -g. ;
Chen, T. -w. ;
Deng, Y. -p. ;
Yu, J. -q. ;
Li, Z-l .
CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2008, 63 (06) :629-635
[7]
First-pass perfusion imaging of solitary pulmonary nodules with 64-detector row CT: comparison of perfusion parameters of malignant and benign lesions [J].
Li, Y. ;
Yang, Z-G ;
Chen, T-W ;
Yu, J-Q ;
Sun, J-Y ;
Chen, H-J .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2010, 83 (993) :785-790
[8]
Peripheral lung carcinoma: Correlation of angiogenesis and first-pass perfusion parameters of 64-detector row CT [J].
Li, Yuan ;
Yang, Zhi-gang ;
Chen, Tian-wu ;
Chen, Hui-jiao ;
Sun, Jia-yu ;
Lu, Yan-rong .
LUNG CANCER, 2008, 61 (01) :44-53
[9]
Tumour angiogenesis and its relation to contrast enhancement on computed tomography: a review [J].
Miles, KA .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1999, 30 (03) :198-205
[10]
Application of CT in the investigation of angiogenesis in oncology [J].
Miles, KA ;
Charnsangavej, C ;
Lee, FT ;
Fishman, EK ;
Horton, K ;
Lee, TY .
ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2000, 7 (10) :840-850