Work motivation and social communication among public managers

被引:29
作者
Park, Sung Min [1 ]
Rainey, Hal G. [2 ]
机构
[1] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Grad Sch Governance, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Univ Georgia, Dept Publ Adm & Policy, Athens, GA 30602 USA
关键词
job involvement; mentoring; organizational behavior; organizational dispositions; public human resource management; red tape; SELF-DETERMINATION THEORY; SERVICE MOTIVATION; ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE; EMPLOYEES; JOB; PERCEPTIONS; COMMITMENT; REWARDS; SECTOR; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1080/09585192.2011.637060
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
This article tests hypotheses about the effects of two types of work motivation (i.e. intrinsic motivation and extrinsic motivation) and four types of social communication on three important work dispositions (i.e. job involvement, red tape, and perceived organizational effectiveness) among 790 managers employed in public agencies in the states of Illinois and Georgia. The results show that intrinsic motivation is significantly associated with public managers' job involvement, perceptions of red tape, and organizational effectiveness. Also, certain types of organizational communication and mentoring socialization are closely related to the outcomes. The results of cross-interaction effects between motivation and communications on outcome variables support the SDT prediction that when public managers are more involved with different types of social communication behaviors, the relationship between extrinsic motivation and three outcome variables becomes more pronounced. That is, communication in public agencies provides more autonomy and discretion for extrinsically motivated public managers, thus leading to more positive organizational dispositions.
引用
收藏
页码:2630 / 2660
页数:31
相关论文
共 101 条
[1]   Two types of bureaucracy: Enabling and coercive [J].
Adler, PS ;
Borys, B .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1996, 41 (01) :61-89
[2]   What determines the behaviour and performance of health professionals? Public service motivation, professional norms and/or economic incentives [J].
Andersen, Lotte Bogh .
INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCES, 2009, 75 (01) :79-97
[3]  
[Anonymous], ANN EUR GROUP PUBL A
[4]  
[Anonymous], PUBLIC ADM REV
[5]  
[Anonymous], PERSONNEL FLEXIBILIT
[6]  
[Anonymous], REV PUBLIC PERSONNEL
[7]  
[Anonymous], REV CONOMIQUE SOCIAL
[8]  
[Anonymous], PUBLIC POLICY ADM
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2006, PUBLIC POLICY ADMIN
[10]  
[Anonymous], J PUBLIC ADM RES THE