Thick vs thin loop transurethral resection of the prostate: a double-blind prospective trial of early morbidity

被引:11
作者
Holmes, M
Cox, J
Stewart, J
King, D
Bary, P
Wright, W
机构
[1] Waikato Hosp, Hamilton, New Zealand
[2] Auckland Med Sch, Auckland, New Zealand
[3] Auckland Hosp, Auckland, New Zealand
关键词
TURP; transurethral vaporization resection; thick loop; outcome;
D O I
10.1046/j.1464-4096.2001.02412.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: To compare blood loss, irrigation requirements and hospital stay between standard transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) and resection incorporating vaporization, i.e. transurethral vaporization resection (TUVRP). Patients and methods: Seventy patients were prospectively randomized in a blinded fashion between TURP with a standard resection loop (thin loop) or resection with a roller cutting electrode (thick loop). The outcome was assessed as the change in haemoglobin at 30 min and 24 h after the resection finished. Secondary outcome measures were irrigation requirements, length of catheterization, hospital stay, changes in serum sodium, and complications. The nursing staff and surgical registrar managing the patients after surgery were unaware of the resection technique used. Results: Data were available for 65 patients (36 thin loop and 29 thick loop resections). The mean decrease in haemoglobin after TURP was 14.8 g/L at 30min and 11.8 g/L at 24 h; for TUVRP the corresponding values were 14.6 and 14.2 g/L (P = 0.69). In addition, there was no difference in irrigation requirements, changes in serum sodium, length of catheterization, hospital stay or bleeding complications. Conclusion: The use of a thick loop at higher cutting current settings during TUVRP offers no advantage over standard thin-loop TURP.
引用
收藏
页码:197 / 201
页数:5
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
DOLL HA, 1992, J UROLOGY, V147, P1566, DOI 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)37628-0
[2]  
Faul P, 1996, EUR UROL, V30, P403
[3]  
Gallucci M., 1997, Journal of Urology, V157, P96
[4]   Holmium laser resection of the prostate: Preliminary results of a new method for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia [J].
Gilling, P ;
Cass, CB ;
Cresswell, MD ;
Fraundorfer, MR .
UROLOGY, 1996, 47 (01) :48-51
[5]   Holmium laser versus transurethral resection of the prostate: A randomized prospective trial with 1-year followup [J].
Gilling, PJ ;
Mackey, M ;
Cresswell, M ;
Kennett, E ;
Kabalin, JN ;
Fraundorfer, MR .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1999, 162 (05) :1640-1644
[6]   A randomized comparative study of the Bandloop* versus the standalid loop for transurethral resection of the prostate [J].
Gotoh, M ;
Okamura, K ;
Hattori, R ;
Nishiyama, N ;
Kobayashi, H ;
Tanaka, K ;
Yamada, S ;
Kato, T ;
Kinukawa, T ;
Ono, Y ;
Ohshima, S .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1999, 162 (05) :1645-1647
[7]  
HAMMADEH MY, 1997, BR J UROL S4, V79, P62
[8]  
Horninger W, 1996, PROSTATE, V28, P195
[9]   Transurethral resection of the prostate versus transurethral electrovaporization of the prostate: A blinded, prospective comparative study with 1-year followup [J].
Kaplan, SA ;
Laor, E ;
Fatal, M ;
Te, AE .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1998, 159 (02) :454-458
[10]  
Madersbacher S, 1999, BJU INT, V83, P227