Influence of performance evaluation rating segmentation on motivation and fairness perceptions

被引:24
作者
Bartol, KM [1 ]
Durham, CC
Poon, JML
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, Robert H Smith Sch Business, Management & Org Fac, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
[2] Calif State Univ Northridge, Coll Business & Econ, Dept Management, Northridge, CA 91330 USA
[3] Univ Kebangsaan Malaysia, Fac Business Management, Bangi 43600, Malaysia
关键词
D O I
10.1037/0021-9010.86.6.1106
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
This studs investigated the impact of rating segmentation (i.e., the number of alternative appraisal categories available tor rating employee performance) on motivation and perceptions of fairness, Participants were 305 student volunteers who performed a catalog search task, A 2 X 4 factorial design with 2 performance rating systems-low segmentation (3 categories) and moderate segmentation (5 categories)-and 4 performance levels was used. Overall the results indicated that the 5-category system resulted in higher self-efficacy regarding participants' ability to reach the next higher rating category, higher goals tor rating improvement, and higher rating improvements than the 3-category system. The effects of rating system and performance rating on rating Improvement were partially mediated by and personal goals The rating system and the performance rating affected perceptions of distributive and procedural justice.
引用
收藏
页码:1106 / 1119
页数:14
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]  
ADAMS JS, 1965, ADV EXP SOC PSYCHOL, V2, P267
[2]   PERSONAL CONTACT, INDIVIDUATION, AND THE BETTER-THAN-AVERAGE EFFECT [J].
ALICKE, MD ;
KLOTZ, ML ;
BREITENBECHER, DL ;
YURAK, TJ ;
VREDENBURG, DS .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1995, 68 (05) :804-825
[3]   DIFFERENTIAL ENGAGEMENT OF SELF-REACTIVE INFLUENCES IN COGNITIVE MOTIVATION [J].
BANDURA, A ;
CERVONE, D .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1986, 38 (01) :92-113
[4]  
Bandura A., 1986, SOCIAL FDN THOUGHT A
[5]  
Bandura A., 1977, SOCIAL LEARNING THEO, VVol. 1
[6]   THE MODERATOR MEDIATOR VARIABLE DISTINCTION IN SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL-RESEARCH - CONCEPTUAL, STRATEGIC, AND STATISTICAL CONSIDERATIONS [J].
BARON, RM ;
KENNY, DA .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 51 (06) :1173-1182
[7]   THE EFFECTS OF PERFORMANCE RATING DISCREPANCIES ON SUPERVISORS AND SUBORDINATES [J].
BLAKELY, GL .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1993, 54 (01) :57-80
[8]   EMPLOYEE REACTIONS TO PERFORMANCE STANDARDS - A REVIEW AND RESEARCH PROPOSITIONS [J].
BOBKO, P ;
COLELLA, A .
PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 1994, 47 (01) :1-29
[9]   THE CURRENT STATE OF PERFORMANCE-APPRAISAL RESEARCH AND PRACTICE - CONCERNS, DIRECTIONS, AND IMPLICATIONS [J].
BRETZ, RD ;
MILKOVICH, GT ;
READ, W .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 1992, 18 (02) :321-352
[10]   An integrative framework for explaining reactions to decisions: Interactive effects of outcomes and procedures [J].
Brockner, J ;
Wiesenfeld, BM .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1996, 120 (02) :189-208