The effects of habitat fragmentation on the genetic structure of small mammal populations

被引:77
作者
Gaines, MS
Diffendorfer, JE
Tamarin, RH
Whittam, TS
机构
[1] UNIV MASSACHUSETTS,DEPT BIOL,LOWELL,MA
[2] PENN STATE UNIV,DEPT BIOL,UNIVERSITY PK,PA 16802
关键词
D O I
10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a023107
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
We present five case studies highlighting the effects of habitat fragmentation on the genetic structure of small mammal populations. The studies reflect different spatial scales and components of genetic variation, In marginal and central populations of Sigmodon hispidus we found less allozymic variation within the marginal population, whereas patterns of morphological variability were the converse. In the rice rat (Oryzomys spp.), nucleotide diversity in mtDNA was similar in an island population in the Florida Keys to mainland populations in the Everglades, This observation contrasts with insular vole populations (Microtus spp,), where isolation on islands results in genetic structuring, Temporal changes in abundance in mainland populations had no effects on genetic differentiation (F(ST)values) because subpopulations did not experience bottlenecks, In an experimentally fragmented landscape, fragmentation influenced demographic processes but not genetic structure, We conclude that (1) with extreme fragmentation, small mammal populations become depauperate of genetic variation and differentiate genetically; (2) different components of genetic variation lead to different genetic structuring; (3) spatial and temporal scales should both be considered when examining genetic structure of populations; (4) demographic and ecological processes are more likely influenced by fragmentation than genetic structure; and (5) there is an interaction between demographic processes and genetic structure.
引用
收藏
页码:294 / 304
页数:11
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]   USE OF RESTRICTION ENDONUCLEASES TO MEASURE MITOCHONDRIAL-DNA SEQUENCE RELATEDNESS IN NATURAL-POPULATIONS .2. MITOCHONDRIAL-DNA CLONES AND MATRIARCHAL PHYLOGENY WITHIN AND AMONG GEOGRAPHIC POPULATIONS OF THE POCKET GOPHER, GEOMYS-PINETIS [J].
AVISE, JC ;
GIBLINDAVIDSON, C ;
LAERM, J ;
PATTON, JC ;
LANSMAN, RA .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 1979, 76 (12) :6694-6698
[2]  
BARBOUR D B, 1982, Florida Scientist, V45, P112
[3]  
Chitty D, 1996, DO LEMMINGS COMMIT S
[4]  
CREASE TJ, 1990, MOL BIOL EVOL, V7, P444
[5]  
DESALLE R, 1987, GENETICS, V116, P215
[6]  
Diffendorfer James E., 1996, P421, DOI 10.1016/B978-012178075-3/50015-5
[7]  
Diffendorfer JE, 1995, LANDSCAPE APPROACHES IN MAMMALIAN ECOLOGY AND CONSERVATION, P175
[8]   HABITAT FRAGMENTATION AND MOVEMENTS OF 3 SMALL MAMMALS (SIGMODON, MICROTUS, AND PEROMYSCUS) [J].
DIFFENDORFER, JE ;
GAINES, MS ;
HOLT, RD .
ECOLOGY, 1995, 76 (03) :827-839
[9]  
Fairbridge R. W, 1974, ENV S FLORIDA PRESEN, P223
[10]   THE EFFECTS OF A SUCCESSIONAL HABITAT MOSAIC ON A SMALL MAMMAL COMMUNITY [J].
FOSTER, J ;
GAINES, MS .
ECOLOGY, 1991, 72 (04) :1358-1373