A prospective randomized trial of high versus low vacuum drainage after axillary dissection for breast cancer

被引:64
作者
Bonnema, J
vanGeel, AN
Ligtenstein, DA
Schmitz, PIM
Wiggers, T
机构
[1] UNIV ROTTERDAM HOSP,DR DANIEL DEN HOED CANC CTR,DEPT SURG ONCOL,NL-3075 EA ROTTERDAM,NETHERLANDS
[2] UNIV ROTTERDAM HOSP,DR DANIEL DEN HOED CANC CTR,DEPT STAT,NL-3075 EA ROTTERDAM,NETHERLANDS
[3] ZUIDER HOSP,DEPT SURG,ROTTERDAM,NETHERLANDS
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0002-9610(96)00416-3
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND AND METHODS: The influence of negative pressure on fluid production and complication rates after axillary dissection for breast cancer was studied in a prospective randomized trial. Patients were randomized for either a high or a low vacuum drainage system. Drainage volumes and complication rates were recorded. RESULTS: NO statistically significant differences were found between the low vacuum group (n = 68) and the high vacuum group (n = 73) in volume (728 mi Versus 780 mi) and duration (9.5 days versus 10 days) of seroma production, number of wound complications (5 versus 6), or infections (3 versus 2), There was a significant positive relationship between body mass index and seroma production, independent of the drainage system (P = 0.002). The drainage volume of the separately drained breast wound after mastectomy and lumpectomy was larger for the high vacuum system (55 mt versus 100 mi, P = 0.02). Vacuum loss was more frequent in the high vacuum drain group (11 versus 2, P = 0.01), where as leakage around the drain occurred more often in the low vacuum group (18 versus 6, P = 0.004). CONCLUSION: There are no differences in axillary fluid production or wound complication rates after axillary dissection and subsequent drainage between high and low vacuum drainage systems. (C) 1997 by Excerpta Medica, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:76 / 79
页数:4
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
AITKEN DR, 1984, SURG GYNECOL OBSTET, V158, P327
[2]   PERIOPERATIVE AND POSTOPERATIVE TRANEXAMIC ACID REDUCES THE LOCAL WOUND COMPLICATION RATE AFTER SURGERY FOR BREAST-CANCER [J].
BONNEMA, J ;
VANGEEL, AN ;
WIGGERS, T ;
LIGTENSTEIN, DA .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1994, 81 (11) :1693-1693
[3]   COMPARISON BETWEEN SUCTION AND CORRUGATED DRAINAGE AFTER SIMPLE MASTECTOMY - REPORT OF A CONTROLLED TRIAL [J].
BOURKE, JB ;
BALFOUR, TW ;
HARDCASTLE, JD ;
WILKINS, JL .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1976, 63 (01) :67-69
[4]  
BROTTIN BJ, 1979, BRIT J SURG, V66, P279
[5]   SUCTION DRAINAGE OF THE AXILLA - A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED TRIAL [J].
CAMERON, AEP ;
EBBS, SR ;
WYLIE, F ;
BAUM, M .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1988, 75 (12) :1211-1211
[6]  
CHERRY G, 1983, INFECT SURG, V1, P243
[7]  
Coveney E C, 1993, Eur J Surg Oncol, V19, P143
[8]  
DOUGHERTHY SH, 1990, CURR PROB SURG, V29, P637
[9]   CDC DEFINITIONS FOR NOSOCOMIAL INFECTIONS, 1988 [J].
GARNER, JS ;
JARVIS, WR ;
EMORI, TG ;
HORAN, TC ;
HUGHES, JM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INFECTION CONTROL, 1988, 16 (03) :128-140
[10]  
Graf J, 1983, Unfallchirurgie, V9, P223