On the Path to Homeownership: Money, Family Composition and Low-income Households

被引:13
作者
Aarland, Kristin [1 ]
Nordvik, Viggo [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] NOVA Norwegian Social Res, N-0208 Oslo, Norway
[2] REASSESS, Oslo, Norway
关键词
Tenure transition; bivariate probit; low-income; homeownership; DECISIONS;
D O I
10.1080/02673030802547439
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In Norway, as in many other countries, homeownership is encouraged politically, and a majority of the households become homeowners at some stage in their life cycle. Many households move house when circumstances change, and it is often at this point that they also make their tenure choice. This paper employs a bivariate probit framework to model the transition rate from renting into homeownership. Using a sample of initial renters, subsequent tenure choice is analysed jointly with the stay-move decision. A particularly important question in this context is whether low-income households face differential constraints on entering owner occupation that could be addressed by policy change. The empirical model includes financial characteristics, household characteristics and changes in household characteristics as explanatory variables. Changes in household composition are particularly important in explaining variations in both tenure choice and mobility. Hence, the common practice of estimating housing market behaviour using a panel of intact households potentially obfuscates important determinants of that behaviour. The paper proceeds by using the equivalent of a Chow test to show that a hypothesis of equal coefficients in samples of low- and high-income households is firmly rejected. Thus low-income households do behave differently. Short-term variations in income appear to have little effect on people's capacity to enter owner occupation. However, low-income households are more dependent on past savings for successful entry. This suggests a rather different policy approach if owner occupation is to be expanded.
引用
收藏
页码:81 / 101
页数:21
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2002, SOCIAL INDICATORS EU
[2]   LIFE-CYCLE CONSUMPTION AND HOMEOWNERSHIP [J].
ARTLE, R ;
VARAIYA, P .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC THEORY, 1978, 18 (01) :38-58
[3]   Explaining the support for homeownership policy in US cities: A political economy perspective [J].
Basolo, Victoria .
HOUSING STUDIES, 2007, 22 (01) :99-119
[4]  
Boehm T.P., 1993, Journal of Housing Economics, V3, P16, DOI [DOI 10.1006/JHEC.1993.1002, 10.1006/jhec.1993.1002]
[5]   The dynamics of race, income, and homeownership [J].
Boehm, TP ;
Schlottmann, AM .
JOURNAL OF URBAN ECONOMICS, 2004, 55 (01) :113-130
[6]   MOVING COSTS AND HOUSING DEMAND - ARE RECENT MOVERS REALLY IN EQUILIBRIUM [J].
EDIN, PA ;
ENGLUND, P .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 1991, 44 (03) :299-320
[7]   Hedging housing risk [J].
Englund, P ;
Hwang, M ;
Quigley, JM .
JOURNAL OF REAL ESTATE FINANCE AND ECONOMICS, 2002, 24 (1-2) :167-200
[8]   Surprises and housing tenure decisions in Great Britain [J].
Ermisch, J ;
DiSalvo, P .
JOURNAL OF HOUSING ECONOMICS, 1996, 5 (03) :247-273
[9]  
Greene H.W., 2008, ECONOMETRIC ANAL, V6th
[10]   Adaptation investments and homeownership [J].
Hansen, Jorgen Drud ;
Skak, Morten .
JOURNAL OF HOUSING ECONOMICS, 2008, 17 (01) :102-115