Imaging of differential protease expression in breast cancers for detection of aggressive tumor phenotypes

被引:117
作者
Bremer, C
Tung, CH
Bogdanov, A
Weissleder, R
机构
[1] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Ctr Mol Imaging Res, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[2] Harvard Med Sch, Boston, MA USA
关键词
breast neoplasms; experimental studies; infrared and near-infrared spectroscopy; animals;
D O I
10.1148/radiol.2223010812
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: To determine if different expression levels of tumor cathepsin-B activity in well differentiated and undifferentiated breast cancers could be revealed in vivo with optical imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A well differentiated human breast cancer (BT20, n = 8) and a highly invasive metastatic human breast cancer (DU4475, n = 8) were implanted orthotopically in athymic nude mice. Tumor-bearing animals were examined in vivo with near-infrared fluorescence (NIRF) imaging 24 hours after intravenous injection of an enzyme-sensing imaging probe. Immunohistochemistry, Western blotting (on cells and whole tumor samples), and correlative fluorescence microscopy were performed. RESULTS: Both types of breast cancers activated the NIRF probe so that tumors became readily detectable. However, in tumors of equal size, there was a 1.5-fold higher fluorescence signal in the highly invasive breast cancer (861 arbitrary units 88) compared with the well differentiated lesion (566 arbitrary units 36, P < .01). Western blotting confirmed a higher cathepsin-B protein content in the highly invasive breast cancer (DU4475) of about 1.4-fold (whole tumor samples) to 1.7-fold (cells). Immunohistochemistry and fluorescence microscopy findings confirmed the imaging findings. CONCLUSION: Cathepsin-B enzyme activity can be determined in vivo with NIRF optical imaging, while differences in tumoral expression may correlate with tumor aggressiveness. (C) RSNA, 2002.
引用
收藏
页码:814 / 818
页数:5
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [1] PROTEINASES AND SIALYLTRANSFERASE IN HUMAN-BREAST TUMORS
    ABECASSIS, J
    COLLARD, R
    EBER, M
    PUSEL, J
    FRICKER, JP
    METHLIN, G
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1984, 33 (06) : 821 - 824
  • [2] BARBI GP, 1994, ONCOLOGY, V51, P329
  • [3] BenitezBribiesca L, 1995, ARCH MED RES, V26, pS163
  • [4] In vivo molecular target assessment of matrix metalloproteinase inhibition
    Bremer, C
    Tung, CH
    Weissleder, R
    [J]. NATURE MEDICINE, 2001, 7 (06) : 743 - 748
  • [5] Matrix metalloproteinase inhibitors
    Brown, PD
    [J]. BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 1998, 52 (1-3) : 125 - 136
  • [6] DIAPHANOGRAPHY IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF BREAST-CANCER
    DREXLER, B
    DAVIS, JL
    SCHOFIELD, G
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1985, 157 (01) : 41 - 44
  • [7] Cancer - Proteases - invasion and more
    Edwards, DR
    Murphy, G
    [J]. NATURE, 1998, 394 (6693) : 527 - 528
  • [8] Molecular regulation, membrane association and secretion of tumor cathepsin B
    Frosch, BA
    Berquin, I
    Emmert-Buck, MR
    Moin, K
    Sloane, BF
    [J]. APMIS, 1999, 107 (01) : 28 - 37
  • [9] TRANS-ILLUMINATION IN BREAST-CANCER DETECTION - SCREENING FAILURES AND POTENTIAL
    GESLIEN, GE
    FISHER, JR
    DELANEY, C
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1985, 144 (03) : 619 - 622
  • [10] Jones JL, 1997, J PATHOL, V183, P377, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9896(199712)183:4<377::AID-PATH951>3.0.CO