A randomized prospective trial of the obstetric forceps versus the M-cup vacuum extractor

被引:104
作者
Bofill, JA [1 ]
Rust, OA [1 ]
Schorr, SJ [1 ]
Brown, RC [1 ]
Martin, RW [1 ]
Martin, JN [1 ]
Morrison, JC [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV MISSISSIPPI,MED CTR,DEPT OBSTET & GYNECOL,JACKSON,MS 39216
关键词
forceps; vacuum extraction; M-cup vacuum extractor cup; cephalhematoma; genital tract lacerations;
D O I
10.1016/S0002-9378(96)70049-2
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to determine the efficacy of the obstetric forceps versus the M-cup, a new vacuum extractor cup, and maternal-neonatal complication rates. STUDY DESIGN: Over a 10-month period operative vaginal deliveries were randomized between the obstetric forceps and the M-cup vacuum extractor cup. Maternal demographics, indication for intervention, analgesia, position, station, degree of asynclitism, fetal caput-molding, and time from application to delivery were prospectively recorded. Episiotomy and extensions, lacerations, and the reason for abandonment of the randomized instrument were noted in both groups. Fetal weight, Apgar scores, cord arterial gases, hyperbilirubinemia, phototherapy, and any evidence of fetal trauma were documented at delivery or in the nursery. RESULTS: Six hundred thirty-seven women were randomized, 315 in the forceps group and 322 in the M-cup group. There were no differences in maternal demographic variables. The station, position, degree of asynclitism, or requirement for rotation was not different between the groups. The corrected efficacy rates were forceps 92% and M-cup 94% (p = 0.217). The M-cup deliveries were accomplished more rapidly than forceps deliveries (p < 0.001) and were associated with a lower rate of episiotomy (p < 0.001), third-degree (p < 0.001) and fourth-degree (p = 0.002) lacerations, but blood loss as clinically estimated (p = 0.232) or as measured by hemoglobin levels (p = 0.166) was not significantly different. Forceps deliveries were associated with fewer clinically diagnosed cephalhematomas (p = 0.015) than M-cup deliveries were, but there were no differences in the number of neonates diagnosed with hyperbilirubinemia (p = 0.377) or in the number of infants treated with phototherapy (p = 0.660). CONCLUSIONS: The M-cup vacuum extractor cup appears to be as efficient (and faster) than the obstetric forceps but is associated with significantly more fetal cephalhematomas, whereas maternal injuries are more common with the forceps.
引用
收藏
页码:1325 / 1330
页数:6
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]  
BERKUS MD, 1985, OBSTET GYNECOL, V66, P503
[2]  
Bofill J. A., 1996, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, V174, P353
[3]   A RANDOMIZED PROSPECTIVE-STUDY COMPARING DELIVERY WITH METAL AND SILICONE-RUBBER VACUUM EXTRACTOR CUPS [J].
CHENOY, R ;
JOHANSON, R .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1992, 99 (05) :360-363
[4]  
DELL DL, 1985, OBSTET GYNECOL, V66, P624
[5]   COMPARISON BETWEEN THE CONVENTIONAL MALMSTROM EXTRACTOR AND A NEW EXTRACTOR WITH SILASTIC CUP [J].
HAMMARSTROM, M ;
CSEMICZKY, G ;
BELFRAGE, P .
ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1986, 65 (07) :791-792
[6]   WORLDWIDE SURVEY OF ASSISTED VAGINAL DELIVERY [J].
HILLIER, CEM ;
JOHANSON, RB .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 1994, 47 (02) :109-114
[7]   NEW DESIGN RIGID AND SOFT VACUUM EXTRACTOR CUPS - A PRELIMINARY COMPARISON OF TRACTION FORCES [J].
HOFMEYR, GJ ;
GOBETZ, L ;
SONNENDECKER, EWW ;
TURNER, MJ .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1990, 97 (08) :681-685
[8]   NORTH-STAFFORDSHIRE WIGAN ASSISTED DELIVERY TRIAL [J].
JOHANSON, R ;
PUSEY, J ;
LIVERA, N ;
JONES, P .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1989, 96 (05) :537-544
[9]   A RANDOMIZED PROSPECTIVE-STUDY COMPARING THE NEW VACUUM EXTRACTOR POLICY WITH FORCEPS DELIVERY [J].
JOHANSON, RB ;
RICE, C ;
DOYLE, M ;
ARTHUR, J ;
ANYANWU, L ;
IBRAHIM, J ;
WARWICK, A ;
REDMAN, CWE ;
OBRIEN, PMS .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1993, 100 (06) :524-530
[10]  
KUIT JA, 1993, OBSTET GYNECOL, V82, P280