A comparison of oral omeprazole and intravenous cimetidine in reducing complications of duodenal peptic ulcer

被引:11
作者
Khoshbaten, M [1 ]
Fattahi, E
Naderi, N
Khaleghian, F
Rezailashkajani, M
机构
[1] Tabriz Univ Med Sci, Liver & Gastrointestinal Dis Res Ctr, Tabriz, Iran
[2] Shahid Beheshti Univ Med Sci, Res Ctr Gastroenterol & Liver Dis, Tehran, Iran
[3] Tabriz Univ Med Sci, Drug Appl Res Ctr, Tabriz, Iran
关键词
D O I
10.1186/1471-230X-6-2
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Gastrointestinal bleeding is a common problem and its most common etiology is peptic ulcer disease. Ulcer rebleeding is considered a perilous complication for patients. To reduce the rate of rebleeding and to fasten the improvement of patients' general conditions, most emergency departments in Iran use H2-blockers before endoscopic procedures (i.e. intravenous omeprazole is not available in Iran). The aim of this study was to compare therapeutic effects of oral omeprazole and intravenous cimetidine on reducing rebleeding rates, duration of hospitalization, and the need for blood transfusion in duodenal ulcer patients. Methods: In this clinical trial, 80 patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding due to duodenal peptic ulcer and endoscopic evidence of rebleeding referring to emergency departments of Imam and Sina hospitals in Tabriz, Iran were randomly assigned to two equal groups; one was treated with intravenous cimetidine 800 mg per day and the other, with 40 mg oral omeprazole per day. Results: No statistically significant difference was found between cimetidine and omeprazole groups in regards to sex, age, alcohol consumption, cigarette smoking, NSAID consumption, endoscopic evidence of rebleeding, mean hemoglobin and mean BUN levels on admission, duration of hospitalization and the mean time of rebleeding. However, the need for blood transfusion was much lower in omeprazole than in cimetidine group (mean: 1.68 versus 3.58 units, respectively; p < 0.003). Moreover, rebleeding rate was significantly lower in omeprazole group (15%) than in cimetidine group (50%) (p < 0.001). Conclusion: This study demonstrated that oral omeprazole significantly excels intravenous cimetidine in reducing the need for blood transfusion and lowering rebleeding rates in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Though not statistically significant (p = 0.074), shorter periods of hospitalization were found for omeprazole group which merits consideration for cost minimization.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 6
页数:6
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
Barkun AN, 1999, ALIMENT PHARM THER, V13, P1565
[2]  
BARKUN AN, 1999, ALIMENT PHARM THER B, P1465
[3]   The efficacy of proton-pump inhibitors in acute ulcer bleeding - A qualitative review [J].
Bustamante, M ;
Stollman, N .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2000, 30 (01) :7-13
[4]   ENDOSCOPIC THERAPY FOR ACUTE NONVARICEAL UPPER GASTROINTESTINAL HEMORRHAGE - A METAANALYSIS [J].
COOK, DJ ;
GUYATT, GH ;
SALENA, BJ ;
LAINE, LA .
GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1992, 102 (01) :139-148
[5]   Effect of omeprazole on the outcome of endoscopically treated bleeding peptic ulcers - Randomized double-blind placebo-controlled multicentre study [J].
DeMuckadell, OBS ;
Havelund, T ;
Harling, H ;
Boesby, S ;
Snel, P ;
Vreeburg, EM ;
Eriksson, S ;
Fernstrom, P ;
Hasselgren, G .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1997, 32 (04) :320-327
[6]  
ERIKSSON S, 1995, EUR J GASTROEN HEPAT, V7, P467
[7]   A cost-effective approach to the patient with peptic ulcer bleeding [J].
Jiranek, GC ;
Kozarek, RA .
SURGICAL CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 1996, 76 (01) :83-&
[8]  
Jung HK, 2002, AM J GASTROENTEROL, V97, P1736
[9]   PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN UPPER GASTROINTESTINAL-BLEEDING [J].
KATSCHINSKI, B ;
LOGAN, R ;
DAVIES, J ;
FAULKNER, G ;
PEARSON, J ;
LANGMAN, M .
DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 1994, 39 (04) :706-712
[10]   Effect of oral omeprazole in reducing re-bleeding in bleeding peptic ulcers: a prospective, double-blind, randomized, clinical trial [J].
Kaviani, MJ ;
Hashemi, MR ;
Kazemifar, AR ;
Roozitalab, S ;
Mostaghni, AA ;
Merat, S ;
Alizadeh-Naini, M ;
Yarmohammadi, H .
ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2003, 17 (02) :211-216