Death certificates provide an adequate source of cause of death information when evaluating lung cancer mortality: An example from the Mayo Lung Project

被引:47
作者
Doria-Rose, V. Paul [1 ,2 ]
Marcus, Pamela M.
机构
[1] NCI, Dept Hlth & Human Serv, NIH, Canc Prevent Div,Biometry Res Grp, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[2] NCI, Canc Prevent Fellowship Program, Off Prevent Oncol, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
关键词
Lung cancer; Death certificate; Mortality; Sensitivity; Specificity; PROSTATE-CANCER; MELANOMA;
D O I
10.1016/j.lungcan.2008.05.019
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 [肿瘤学];
摘要
To assess the accuracy of death certificates in assigning lung cancer as the underlying cause of death, death certificate data were compared to mortality review committee-determined causes of death among participants in the Mayo Lung Project. Further, the impact of death certificate misclassification on lung cancer mortality rates and Cox proportional hazards models was evaluated. The Mayo Lung Project (1971-1983) was a randomized controlled trial of lung cancer screening; participants were male smokers aged 45 years and older who were seen as outpatients at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota. Overall there were 237 lung cancer deaths according to mortality review, and 224 according to the death certificate (sensitivity 88.6 percent, 95 percent confidence interval (CI) 83.9, 92.4; specificity 99.1 percent, 95 percent CI 98.6, 99.5). As compared to the mortality review committee's determination, the use of death certificate data resulted only in slight decreases to the calculated lung cancer mortality rates for each screening arm, and did not result in appreciable changes to hazard ratios for lung cancer mortality in Cox regression models. In these data, death certificates were sufficiently sensitive and specific such that their use did not result in a meaningful change to mortality-based outcomes. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:295 / 300
页数:6
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]
A comparison of cause of death determination in men previously diagnosed with prostate cancer who died in 1985 or 1995 [J].
Albertsen, PC ;
Walters, S ;
Hanley, JA .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2000, 163 (02) :519-523
[2]
Management of cancer from an unknown primary [J].
Armstrong, Anne C. ;
Blackhall, Fiona H. .
EXPERT OPINION ON PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2007, 8 (04) :445-455
[3]
Black WC, 2002, JNCI-J NATL CANCER I, V94, P167, DOI 10.1093/jnci/94.3.167
[4]
BREAUX S, 1984, AM J CLIN ONCOL-CANC, V7, P375, DOI 10.1097/00000421-198408000-00016
[5]
Report on the 2003 revision of the US standard certificate of death [J].
Davis, GG ;
Onaka, AT .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF FORENSIC MEDICINE AND PATHOLOGY, 2001, 22 (01) :38-42
[6]
Dundon M L, 1983, Vital Health Stat 4, V4, P1
[7]
Colorectal cancer deaths as determined by expert committee and from death certificate: A comparison. The Minnesota Study [J].
Ederer, F ;
Geisser, MS ;
Mongin, SJ ;
Church, TR ;
Mandel, JS .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1999, 52 (05) :447-452
[8]
FONTANA RS, 1991, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V67, P1155, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19910215)67:4+<1155::AID-CNCR2820671509>3.0.CO
[9]
2-0
[10]
THE 1989 REVISIONS OF THE UNITED-STATES STANDARD CERTIFICATES OF LIVE BIRTH AND DEATH AND THE UNITED-STATES STANDARD REPORT OF FETAL DEATH [J].
FREEDMAN, MA ;
GAY, GA ;
BROCKERT, JE ;
POTRZEBOWSKI, PW ;
ROTHWELL, CJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1988, 78 (02) :168-172