Prognostic value of troponins in sepsis: a meta-analysis

被引:124
作者
Bessiere, Francis [1 ]
Khenifer, Safia [1 ]
Dubourg, Julie [2 ]
Durieu, Isabelle [1 ]
Lega, Jean-Christophe [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lyon 1, Dept Vasc & Internal Med, Hop Lyon Sud, Hosp Civils Lyon, F-69622 Villeurbanne, France
[2] Univ Lyon 1, Dept Clin Pharmacol, F-69622 Villeurbanne, France
[3] Ctr Hosp Lyon Sud, Hosp Civils Lyon Lyon, Dept Internal & Vasc Med, F-69495 Pierre Benite, France
关键词
Sepsis; Prognosis; Sensitivity; Specificity; Meta-analysis; CARDIAC TROPONIN; MYOCARDIAL DYSFUNCTION; SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS; TEST ACCURACY; SEPTIC SHOCK; MARKER; HETEROGENEITY; INJURY; ELEVATION; BIAS;
D O I
10.1007/s00134-013-2902-3
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
The role of biomarkers such as troponin in risk stratification of sepsis is still debated. The aim of this meta-analysis is to assess the relation between troponin elevation in sepsis and mortality. All observational studies from Embase, Medline and those manually searched up to September 2010 were included. Studies identified were those which reported on patients with a diagnosis of sepsis and if a 2 x 2 table could be constructed based on troponins and death. We pooled the relative risk (RR) and odds-ratio (OR) using the inverse variance method in studies that conducted univariate and multivariable (adjusted) analysis. Thirteen studies encompassing 1,227 patients were included. The prevalence of elevated troponin was 61 % ([95 %] CI 58-64 %). Elevated troponin was significantly associated with all-cause mortality (RR 1.91; CI 1.63-2.24), with homogeneity across studies. In adjusted analysis (four studies comprising 791 patients) according to prognostic scores, elevated troponin was associated with an increased risk of death (OR 1.92; CI 1.35-2.74). The area under the ROC curve was 0.68 (CI 0.63-0.71). Pooled sensitivity and specificity were 77 % (CI 61-88) and 47 % (CI 30-64) with heterogeneity across studies. It corresponded to positive and negative likelihood ratios of 1.50 (95 % CI: 1.20-1.90) and 0.49 (CI 0.38-0.64), respectively. Elevated troponin identifies a subset of patients with sepsis at higher risk of death. Further studies are needed to define the precise role of troponins and their optimal cut-offs.
引用
收藏
页码:1181 / 1189
页数:9
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
Altmann DR, 2010, PLOS ONE, P5
[2]   Elevation of troponin I in sepsis and septic shock [J].
Ammann, P ;
Fehr, T ;
Minder, EI ;
Günter, C ;
Bertel, O .
INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2001, 27 (06) :965-969
[3]   Epidemiology of severe sepsis in the United States: Analysis of incidence, outcome, and associated costs of care [J].
Angus, DC ;
Linde-Zwirble, WT ;
Lidicker, J ;
Clermont, G ;
Carcillo, J ;
Pinsky, MR .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2001, 29 (07) :1303-1310
[4]   Bivariate random effects meta-analysis of ROC curves [J].
Arends, L. R. ;
Hamza, T. H. ;
van Houwelingen, J. C. ;
Heijenbrok-Kal, M. H. ;
Hunink, M. G. M. ;
Stijnen, T. .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2008, 28 (05) :621-638
[5]   Understanding heterogeneity in meta-analysis: the role of meta-regression [J].
Baker, W. L. ;
White, C. Michael ;
Cappelleri, J. C. ;
Kluger, J. ;
Coleman, C. I. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2009, 63 (10) :1426-1434
[6]   DEFINITIONS FOR SEPSIS AND ORGAN FAILURE AND GUIDELINES FOR THE USE OF INNOVATIVE THERAPIES IN SEPSIS [J].
BONE, RC ;
BALK, RA ;
CERRA, FB ;
DELLINGER, RP ;
FEIN, AM ;
KNAUS, WA ;
SCHEIN, RMH ;
SIBBALD, WJ .
CHEST, 1992, 101 (06) :1644-1655
[7]   Cardiac troponin level is not an independent predictor of mortality in septic patients requiring medical intensive care unit admission [J].
Brivet, Francois G. ;
Jacobs, Frederic M. ;
Colin, Patrice ;
Prat, Dominique ;
Grigoriu, Bogdan .
CRITICAL CARE, 2006, 10 (01)
[8]  
Choon-ngarm Tanarat, 2008, Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand, V91, P1818
[9]   EasyMA: A program for the meta-analysis of clinical trials [J].
Cucherat, M ;
Boissel, JP ;
Leizorovicz, A ;
Haugh, MC .
COMPUTER METHODS AND PROGRAMS IN BIOMEDICINE, 1997, 53 (03) :187-190
[10]   The performance of tests of publication bias and other sample size effects in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy was assessed [J].
Deeks, JJ ;
Macaskill, P ;
Irwig, L .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2005, 58 (09) :882-893