Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: Lessons from the first year under the Model of End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) organ allocation policy

被引:75
作者
Yao, FY
Bass, NM
Ascher, NL
Roberts, AP
机构
[1] Univ San Francisco, Dept Med, Div Gastroenterol, San Francisco, CA 94117 USA
[2] Univ San Francisco, Dept Surg, Div Transplantat, San Francisco, CA 94117 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1002/lt.20159
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
We examined the impact of the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) organ allocation scheme on 44 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) awaiting orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) between February 2002 and January 2003, and compared the outcome with 58 patients listed in the 4 years before MELD implementation. Patients undergoing living-donor liver transplantation were excluded. The Kaplan-Meier probabilities for OLT at 3, 6, and up to 8.5 months were 22.5%, 64.0%, and 88.0%, respectively, under MELD versus 17.2%, 24.7%, and 35.8% at 3, 6 and 9 months, respectively, in the pre-MELD group (P =.0006). In Cox regression analysis, non-O blood group (hazard ratio 2.5; P =.047 versus blood group 0) and 3 tumor nodules (hazard ratio 5.5; P =.005) were associated with a significantly higher probability for OLT under MELD. The probabilities of dropout were 5.6% at 6 and 8.5 months under MELD versus 7.2% and 37.8% at 6 and 12 months, respectively, in the pre-MELD group (P =.74). The lack of a significant difference in dropout may be due to low dropout rates in the first 6 months in either group. No HCC was found in the explant in I patient from each group. In conclusion, the HCC-adjusted MELD system signifi-cantly improved the probability of timely OLT, albeit a significant disadvantage for blood group 0 was evident. Compared with preliminary UNOS data, in which 90% of patients with HCC have received OLT within 3 months, our results reflect the wide regional variation in the impact of MELD.
引用
收藏
页码:621 / 630
页数:10
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] Domino liver transplants for metabolic disorders: Experience with familial amyloidotic polyneuropathy
    Azoulay, D
    Samuel, D
    Castaing, D
    Adam, R
    Adams, D
    Said, G
    Bismuth, H
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 1999, 189 (06) : 584 - 593
  • [2] Clinical management of hepatocellular carcinoma.: Conclusions of the Barcelona-2000 EASL Conference
    Bruix, J
    Sherman, M
    Llovet, JM
    Beaugrand, M
    Lencioni, R
    Burroughs, AK
    Christensen, E
    Pagliaro, L
    Colombo, M
    Rodés, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY, 2001, 35 (03) : 421 - 430
  • [3] EDMONDSON HA, 1954, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V7, P462, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(195405)7:3<462::AID-CNCR2820070308>3.0.CO
  • [4] 2-E
  • [5] Increased waiting time for liver transplantation results in higher mortality
    Everhart, JE
    Lombardero, M
    Detre, KM
    Zetterman, RK
    Wiesner, RH
    Lake, JR
    Hoofnagle, JH
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION, 1997, 64 (09) : 1300 - 1306
  • [6] Freeman RB, 2003, LIVER TRANSPLANT, V9, pC31
  • [7] FREEMAN RB, 2003, AM J TRANSPL S5, V3, P284
  • [8] Chemoembolization followed by liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma impedes tumor progression while on the waiting list and leads to excellent outcome
    Graziadei, IW
    Sandmueller, H
    Waldenberger, P
    Koenigsrainer, A
    Nachbaur, K
    Jaschke, W
    Margreiter, R
    Vogel, W
    [J]. LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2003, 9 (06) : 557 - 563
  • [9] A model to predict survival in patients with end-stage liver disease
    Kamath, PS
    Wiesner, RH
    Malinchoc, M
    Kremers, W
    Therneau, TM
    Kosberg, CL
    D'Amico, G
    Dickson, ER
    Kim, WR
    [J]. HEPATOLOGY, 2001, 33 (02) : 464 - 470
  • [10] Keeffe EB, 1998, LIVER TRANSPLANT SUR, V4, pS108