Efficacy of nefopam for the prevention and treatment of amphotericin B-induced shivering

被引:9
作者
Rosa, G
DellUtri, D
Conti, G
Pelaia, P
Cogliati, A
Orsi, P
Gasparetto, A
机构
[1] UNIV ROMA LA SAPIENZA, INST ANESTHESIA & INTENS CARE, ROME, ITALY
[2] UNIV TRIESTE, INST ANESTHESIA & INTENS CARE, TRIESTE, ITALY
关键词
D O I
10.1001/archinte.157.14.1589
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Shivering is experienced by up to 70% of patients undergoing amphotericin B therapy. Treatment with meperidine hydrochloride, currently the most widely used medication for controlling amphotericin B-induced shivering, was compared with nefopam hydrochloride, which has been successfully used to treat postoperative shivering. Methods: Forty-five patients with cancer and systemic fungal infections randomly received nefopam hydrochloride, 0.3 mg/kg, meperidine hydrochloride, 0.7 mg/kg, or saline solution intravenously 15 minutes before the cessation of amphotericin B infusion (1 mg/kg for 45 minutes). If shivering persisted, patients in the control (saline solution) group received either nefopam hydrochloride, 0.3 mg/kg, or meperidine hydrochloride, 0.7 mg/kg. Results: Occurrence of shivering 15 minutes after the cessation of amphotericin B infusion was significantly less frequent in the nefopam (6.6%) and meperidine (40%) groups compared with the control group (66.6%). The incidence of shivering in the nefopam group with respect to the meperidine group was also significantly reduced. Moreover, nefopam administration to 5 persistently shivering patients in the control group definitively stopped the shivering in all of them (100%) in a mean (+/-SD) time of 29.1 +/- 4.8 seconds, while meperidine terminated shivering in 4 (80%) of 5 patients in a mean (+/-SD) time of 200.0 +/- 30.2 seconds. The adverse reactions that ran be ascribed to nefopam or meperidine use were nausea and sedation, respectively, and may be considered negligible. Conclusion: Nefopam seems to be more effective than meperidine in preventing and quickly suppressing amphotericin B-induced shivering.
引用
收藏
页码:1589 / 1592
页数:4
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]   MEPERIDINE FOR THE TREATMENT OF SHAKING CHILLS AND FEVER [J].
BURKS, LC ;
AISNER, J ;
FORTNER, CL ;
WIERNIK, PH .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1980, 140 (04) :483-484
[2]   A CONTROLLED TRIAL OF THE TOLERANCE OF AMPHOTERICIN-B INFUSED IN DEXTROSE OR IN INTRALIPID IN PATIENTS WITH HEMATOLOGICAL MALIGNANCIES [J].
CAILLOT, D ;
RENY, G ;
SOLARY, E ;
CASASNOVAS, O ;
CHAVANET, P ;
BONNOTTE, B ;
PERELLO, L ;
DUMAS, M ;
ENTEZAM, F ;
GUY, H .
JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 1994, 33 (03) :603-613
[3]   PHARMACOLOGICAL MODULATION OF INTERLEUKIN-1 EXPRESSION BY AMPHOTERICIN B-STIMULATED HUMAN MONONUCLEAR-CELLS [J].
CLEARY, JD ;
CHAPMAN, SW ;
NOLAN, RL .
ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 1992, 36 (05) :977-981
[4]   EFFECT OF INFUSION RATE ON AMPHOTERICIN B-ASSOCIATED FEBRILE REACTIONS [J].
CLEARY, JD ;
WEISDORF, D ;
FLETCHER, CV .
DRUG INTELLIGENCE & CLINICAL PHARMACY, 1988, 22 (10) :769-772
[5]   DOUBLE-BLIND RANDOMIZED STUDY OF THE EFFECT OF INFUSION RATES ON TOXICITY OF AMPHOTERICIN-B [J].
ELLIS, ME ;
ALHOKAIL, AA ;
CLINK, HM ;
PADMOS, MA ;
ERNST, P ;
SPENCE, DG ;
THARPE, WN ;
HILLIER, VF .
ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 1992, 36 (01) :172-179
[6]   INDUCTION OF PROSTAGLANDIN SYNTHESIS AS THE MECHANISM RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CHILLS AND FEVER PRODUCED BY INFUSING AMPHOTERICIN-B [J].
GIGLIOTTI, F ;
SHENEP, JL ;
LOTT, L ;
THORNTON, D .
JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 1987, 156 (05) :784-789
[7]   PREVENTION OF AMPHOTERICIN-B-INDUCED RIGORS BY DANTROLENE [J].
GROSS, MH ;
FULKERSON, WJ ;
MOORE, JO .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1986, 146 (08) :1587-1588
[8]   NEFOPAM - A REVIEW OF ITS PHARMACOLOGICAL PROPERTIES AND THERAPEUTIC EFFICACY [J].
HEEL, RC ;
BROGDEN, RN ;
PAKES, GE ;
SPEIGHT, TM ;
AVERY, GS .
DRUGS, 1980, 19 (04) :249-267
[9]  
IMNE MM, 1990, BRIT J ANAESTH, V64, P346
[10]   OXYGEN-UPTAKE DURING RECOVERY FOLLOWING NALOXONE - RELATIONSHIP WITH INTRAOPERATIVE HEAT-LOSS [J].
JUST, B ;
DELVA, E ;
CAMUS, Y ;
LIENHART, A .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1992, 76 (01) :60-64