Measurement of sound emission by endoscopic lithotripters:: An in vitro study and theoretical estimation of risk of hearing loss in a fetus

被引:16
作者
Karlsen, SJ [1 ]
Bull-Njaa, T
Krokstad, A
机构
[1] Univ Oslo, Aker Hosp, Oslo Urol Clin, N-0514 Oslo, Norway
[2] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, Fac Engn & Telecommun, Dept Acoust, N-7034 Trondheim, Norway
关键词
D O I
10.1089/089277901753205825
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: There is concern about applying intraureteral lithotripsy in pregnant patients, as the sound created by the equipment may damage fetal hearing. Materials and Methods: The sound intensities produced by electrokinetic, pneumomechanic, holmium laser, ultrasound, and electrohydraulic intraluminal lithotripters were measured in an in vitro model. Results: The purely mechanical modalities (electrokinetic and pneumomechanic) generated lower peak pressures than the other devices. Theoretical calculations were performed based on the fact that in vivo, the sound path and the fetal middle ear cavities are filled with fluid. Calculated pressure levels that give displacement amplitudes of the tympanic membrane, the ossicles, and the basilar membrane comparable to hearing loss risk criteria for airborne impulsive noise are greater than measured for all of the lithotripters. The fluid-filled middle ear thus seems to give the fetus protection against sound. The fluid also improves the symmetry of the cochlea structure, reducing the influence of direct bone transmission. Conclusions: The peak pressure of the sound emitted by lithotripsy in the ureter during pregnancy is unlikely to be harmful to fetal hearing. Other risk factors, such as the form of the sound waves and the pulse duration were not evaluated. The theoretical assessments are simplified, and one should be careful about drawing conclusions from theoretical considerations and calculations alone.
引用
收藏
页码:821 / 826
页数:6
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
Bakke A, 1998, SCAND J UROL NEPHR S, V110, P243
[2]   Management of ureteric calculi during pregnancy by ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy [J].
Carringer, M ;
Swartz, R ;
Johansson, JE .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1996, 77 (01) :17-20
[3]  
CHAUSSY CG, 1988, J ENDOUROL, V2, P97
[4]   MANAGEMENT OF URINARY CALCULI DURING PREGNANCY [J].
DENSTEDT, JD ;
RAZVI, H .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1992, 148 (03) :1072-1075
[5]   Fetotoxicity and teratogenesis of SWL treatment in the rabbit [J].
Frankenschmidt, A ;
Heisler, M .
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 1998, 12 (01) :15-21
[6]  
HENDRICKS SK, 1991, SURG GYNECOL OBSTET, V172, P49
[7]  
Houston SS, 1996, AERONAUT J, V100, P1
[8]   STONES IN PREGNANCY AND IN CHILDREN [J].
KROOVAND, RL .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1992, 148 (03) :1076-1078
[9]   Effect of middle ear pressure change on middle ear mechanics [J].
Murakami, S ;
Gyo, K ;
Goode, RL .
ACTA OTO-LARYNGOLOGICA, 1997, 117 (03) :390-395
[10]   URETEROSCOPIC DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT OF URINARY CALCULI DURING PREGNANCY [J].
RITTENBERG, MH ;
BAGLEY, DH .
UROLOGY, 1988, 32 (05) :427-428