Total gastrectomy with distal pancreatectomy and splenectomy for advanced gastric cancer

被引:29
作者
Takeuchi, K
Tsuzuki, Y
Ando, T
Sekihara, M
Hara, T
Yoshikawa, X
Ohno, Y
Kuwano, H
机构
[1] Tone Chuo Hosp, Dept Surg, Numata, Gunma 3780053, Japan
[2] Tone Chuo Hosp, Dept Pathol, Numata, Gunma 3780053, Japan
[3] Gunma Univ, Sch Med, Dept Surg, Gunma, Japan
关键词
total gastrectomy with distal pancreatectomy and splenectomy; lymph node metastasis around the splenic artery and splenic hilus; postoperative mortality and morbidity; survival rate;
D O I
10.1006/jsre.2001.6272
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background. Pancreaticosplenectomy (PS) is often performed simultaneously with total gastrectomy (TG) to facilitate dissection of the lymph nodes around the splenic artery and splenic hilus. To evaluate the effects of PS on survival, a retrospective study was performed. Methods. Various clinicopathological factors influencing lymph node metastasis around the splenic hilus (No. 10) and the splenic artery (No. 11) were studied retrospectively in the upper or middle third of advanced gastric cancer patients who underwent TG with PS. The postoperative morbidity, mortality, and survival rate of patients who underwent TG with PS (the TG with PS group) were compared with those of patients who underwent TG alone (the TG-alone group). Results. Tumor size larger than 41 mm and lymph node No. 2 metastasis were independently correlated with lymph node No. 10 and No. 11 metastasis. The mortality rate was similar, but the morbidity rate was significantly higher in the TG with PS group. In the patients with stage I and III, there was no significant difference between the two groups, but in the patients with stage 11, the TG-alone group was significantly better than the TG with PS group (P = 0.0400). Conclusions. Combined PS with TG should never be performed as the standard surgical procedure for every stage of gastric cancer, especially stage II. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science.
引用
收藏
页码:196 / 201
页数:6
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   Extended lymph-node dissection for gastric cancer [J].
Bonenkamp, JJ ;
Hermans, J ;
Sasako, M ;
van de Velde, CJH .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1999, 340 (12) :908-914
[2]   Postoperative morbidity and mortality after D-1 and D-2 resections for gastric cancer: Preliminary results of the MRC randomised controlled surgical trial [J].
Cuschieri, A ;
Fayers, P ;
Fielding, J ;
Craven, J ;
Bancewicz, J ;
Joypaul, V ;
Cook, P .
LANCET, 1996, 347 (9007) :995-999
[3]  
FORTNER JG, 1994, CANCER, V73, P8, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19940101)73:1<8::AID-CNCR2820730104>3.0.CO
[4]  
2-O
[5]   PRESERVATION OF THE SPLEEN IMPROVES SURVIVAL AFTER RADICAL SURGERY FOR GASTRIC-CANCER [J].
GRIFFITH, JP ;
SUELING, HM ;
MARTIN, I ;
DIXON, MF ;
MCMAHON, MJ ;
AXON, ATR ;
JOHNSTON, D .
GUT, 1995, 36 (05) :684-690
[6]  
HERMANEK P, 1987, TNM CLASSIFICATION M, P43
[7]  
KAJITANI T, 1981, JPN J SURG, V11, P127
[8]   Is there a benefit of pancreaticosplenectomy with gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer? [J].
Kasakura, Y ;
Fujii, M ;
Mochizuki, F ;
Kochi, M ;
Kaiga, T .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2000, 179 (03) :237-242
[9]   No survival benefit from combined pancreaticosplenectomy and total gastrectomy for gastric cancer [J].
Kitamura, K ;
Nishida, S ;
Ichikawa, D ;
Taniguchi, H ;
Hagiwara, A ;
Yamaguchi, T ;
Sawai, K .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1999, 86 (01) :119-122
[10]   RESULTS OF RESECTION OF GASTRIC-CANCER EXTENDING TO ADJACENT ORGANS [J].
KORENAGA, D ;
OKAMURA, T ;
BABA, H ;
SAITO, A ;
SUGIMACHI, K .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1988, 75 (01) :12-15