Orienting attention in time - Modulation of brain potentials

被引:285
作者
Miniussi, C
Wilding, EL
Coull, JT
Nobre, AC
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Dept Expt Psychol, Oxford OX1 3UD, England
[2] Inst Neurol, Wellcome Dept Cognit Neurol, Funct Imaging Lab, London WC1N 3BG, England
基金
英国惠康基金;
关键词
temporal orienting; attention; ERPs; contingent negative variation; P300;
D O I
10.1093/brain/122.8.1507
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
With the aim of casting light on the neural mechanisms that support our ability to modulate visual attention over time, we recorded event-related potentials (ERPs) while normal human subjects performed a target detection task with temporal contingencies between cue and target stimuli. The task used two central cues, which predicted (80% validity) when a subsequent target would occur (either 600 or 1400 ms after cue onset). Unlike previous tasks of attentional orienting, there was no spatial information provided and all stimuli were presented foveally. Reaction times and ERPs linked to targets presented at the shorter interval showed significant effects linked to attentional orienting. Reaction times were faster when the cues correctly predicted the cue-target interval, suggesting the ability of the brain to use information about time to deploy attentional resources. ERPs differed according to the predicted time interval. In particular, the P300 amplitude and latency were enhanced when the cue predicted the cue-target interval accurately. The ERPs elicited by the cues also differed according to the time interval that they predicted. Differences were observed in potentials linked to motor preparation and expectancies. The results reveal dynamic neural activity involved in orienting attention to time intervals, as well as the consequent modulation of target-related neural activity resulting from differing temporal expectations.
引用
收藏
页码:1507 / 1518
页数:12
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]  
*AM EL SOC, 1993, J CLIN NEUROPHYSIOL, V10, P123
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1994, J Clin Neurophysiol, V11, P111
[3]   Time perception in a neglected space [J].
Basso, G ;
Nichelli, P ;
Frassinetti, F ;
diPellegrino, G .
NEUROREPORT, 1996, 7 (13) :2111-2114
[4]   TIME COURSE OF PREPARATION [J].
BERTELSON, P .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1967, 19 :272-+
[5]   TIME UNCERTAINTY AND CHOICE REACTION TIME [J].
BERTELSON, P ;
BOONS, JP .
NATURE, 1960, 187 (4736) :531-532
[6]   ON THE INTERACTION OF S-R COMPATIBILITY WITH OTHER VARIABLES AFFECTING REACTION-TIME [J].
BROADBENT, DE ;
GREGORY, M .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1965, 56 (01) :61-67
[7]   MOVEMENT AND STIMULUS PRECEDING NEGATIVITY [J].
BRUNIA, CHM .
BIOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1988, 26 (1-3) :165-178
[8]  
CORBETTA M, 1993, J NEUROSCI, V13, P1202
[9]  
Coull JT, 1998, J NEUROSCI, V18, P7426
[10]   EFFECTS OF ATTENTION AND STIMULUS PROBABILITY ON ERPS IN A GO/NOGO TASK [J].
EIMER, M .
BIOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1993, 35 (02) :123-138