Assessing a Measurement of Organizational Preparedness for Corporate Entrepreneurship

被引:103
作者
Hornsby, Jeffrey S. [1 ]
Kuratko, Donald F. [2 ]
Holt, Daniel T. [3 ]
Wales, William J. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Missouri Kansas City, Regnier Inst Entrepreneurship & Innovat, Kansas City, MO USA
[2] Indiana Univ, Kelley Sch Business, Johnson Ctr Entrepreneurship & Innovat, Bloomington, IN 47405 USA
[3] Mississippi State Univ, Dept Management & Informat Syst, Mississippi State, MS 39762 USA
[4] James Madison Univ, Zane Showker Coll Business, Harrisonburg, VA 22807 USA
关键词
MAXIMUM-LIKELIHOOD-ESTIMATION; BUSINESS PERFORMANCE; MISSING DATA; ORIENTATION; WORK; MANAGEMENT; SUGGESTIONS; ENVIRONMENT; VALIDATION; PERCEPTION;
D O I
10.1111/jpim.12038
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Research has shown that the manifestation of corporate entrepreneurship is an important strategy for the success of private-and public-sector organizations. The Corporate Entrepreneurship Assessment Instrument (CEAI) is an instrument that was developed to measure the key internal organizational factors that influence a firm's entrepreneurial activities and outcomes. The present research employs three studies to assess the content, construct, and convergent validity of the CEAI using a well-established framework for scale development and refinement. The CEAI was found to be a relatively stable instrument, although the factor structure that emerged varied slightly from the original instrument. In sum, as a result of our analyses, a more parsimonious and psychometrically sound set of items for each factor was derived yielding an 18-item instrument based upon the original 48-item measure. Our studies of the CEAI present a timely contribution toward advancing research in the area of organizational preparedness for corporate entrepreneurship.
引用
收藏
页码:937 / 955
页数:19
相关论文
共 70 条
[1]   Organizational support for intrapreneurship and its interaction with human capital to enhance innovative performance [J].
Alpkan, Lutfihak ;
Bulut, Cagri ;
Gunday, Gurhan ;
Ulusoy, Gunduz ;
Kilic, Kemal .
MANAGEMENT DECISION, 2010, 48 (5-6) :732-755
[2]  
Anakwe U.P., 1999, J MANAGERIAL ISSUES, V11, P315
[3]   PREDICTING THE PERFORMANCE OF MEASURES IN A CONFIRMATORY FACTOR-ANALYSIS WITH A PRETEST ASSESSMENT OF THEIR SUBSTANTIVE VALIDITIES [J].
ANDERSON, JC ;
GERBING, DW .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1991, 76 (05) :732-740
[4]   STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE - A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED 2-STEP APPROACH [J].
ANDERSON, JC ;
GERBING, DW .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1988, 103 (03) :411-423
[5]  
[Anonymous], THESIS U PRETORIA PR
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1999, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, DOI [10.1007/978-3-540-48543-8_4, DOI 10.1177/104225879902300302]
[7]  
Moriano JA, 2009, AN PSICOL-SPAIN, V25, P277
[8]  
Arbuckle J.L., 2007, AMOS 16 user's guide
[9]   Measuring Impression Management in Organizations: A Scale Development Based on the Jones and Pittman Taxonomy [J].
Bolino, Mark C. ;
Turnley, William H. .
ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH METHODS, 1999, 2 (02) :187-206
[10]  
BRIZEK MG, 2003, THESIS VIRGINIA POLY