Targeting effective blood pressure control with angiotensin receptor blockers

被引:27
作者
Asmar, R [1 ]
机构
[1] Inst Cardiovasc, F-75016 Paris, France
关键词
angiotensin II receptor blockers; antihypertensive therapy; blood pressure monitoring;
D O I
10.1111/j.1368-5031.2006.00784.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 [临床医学]; 100201 [内科学];
摘要
Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) have become established as a major class of anti hypertensive on the basis of their powerful effects on blood pressure (BP), excellent tolerability and pleiotropic end-organ-protective effects. However, individual ARBs vary in antihypertensive efficacy, which may be important to clinical outcome. Several strategies are available to ensure that BP reductions with ARBs are at least as great as that which can be achieved with other antihypertensive classes. Firstly, several newer ARBs, including irbesartan, candesartan, telmisartan and olmesartan, have been reported to provide equivalent antihypertensive efficacy to amlodipine and greater efficacy than either losartan, valsartan or both. Secondly, increases in dose may improve the antihypertensive efficacy of agents such as valsartan, although clinical studies are necessary to provide characterisation of new, higher-dose monotherapies. Thirdly, fixed dose combinations with hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) increase the anti hypertensive effect of all ARBs. It is likely that differences in efficacy between newer and older ARBs will in some cases be sustained in combination therapy, such that the most potent ARBs and HCTZ will provide another tier of control. The future use Of ARBs is likely to involve a growing emphasis on compound-specific data, with regard to the antihypertensive efficacy and pleiotropic protective actions of agents.
引用
收藏
页码:315 / 320
页数:6
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]
*ALLHAT OFF COORD, 2002, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V288, P2981, DOI DOI 10.1001/JAMA.288.23.2981
[2]
Ball Keith J., 2001, Journal of Hypertension, V19, pS49
[3]
Pharmacological differences among angiotensin II receptor antagonists [J].
Belz, GG .
BLOOD PRESSURE, 2001, 10 :13-18
[5]
A home blood pressure monitoring study comparing the antihypertensive efficacy of two angiotensin II receptor antagonist fixed combinations [J].
Bobrie, G ;
Delonca, L ;
Moulin, C ;
Giacomino, A ;
Postel-Vinay, N ;
Asmar, R .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2005, 18 (11) :1482-1488
[6]
Effects of losartan on renal and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy [J].
Brenner, BM ;
Cooper, ME ;
de Zeeuw, D ;
Keane, WF ;
Mitch, WE ;
Parving, HH ;
Remuzzi, G ;
Snapinn, SM ;
Zhang, ZX ;
Shahinfar, S .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2001, 345 (12) :861-869
[7]
Effects of telmisartan 80 mg and valsartan 160 mg on ambulatory blood pressure in patients with essential hypertension [J].
Calvo, C ;
Hermida, RC ;
Ayala, DE ;
Ruilope, LM .
JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2004, 22 (04) :837-846
[8]
Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure [J].
Chobanian, AV ;
Bakris, GL ;
Black, HR ;
Cushman, WC ;
Green, LA ;
Izzo, JL ;
Jones, DW ;
Materson, BJ ;
Oparil, S ;
Wright, JT ;
Roccella, EJ .
HYPERTENSION, 2003, 42 (06) :1206-1252
[9]
Antihypertensive efficacy and safety of olmesartan medoxomil compared with amlodipine for mild-to-moderate hypertension [J].
Chrysant, SG ;
Marbury, TC ;
Robinson, TD .
JOURNAL OF HUMAN HYPERTENSION, 2003, 17 (06) :425-432
[10]
A randomized trial of the angiotensin-receptor blocker valsartan in chronic heart failure [J].
Cohn, JN ;
Tognoni, G .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2001, 345 (23) :1667-1675