Implantable contraceptives for women: effectiveness, discontinuation rates, return of fertility, and outcome of pregnancies

被引:66
作者
Glasier, A [1 ]
机构
[1] Lothian Primary Care NHS Trust, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
[2] Univ Edinburgh, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
关键词
contraception; implants; effectiveness; continuation rates; fertility;
D O I
10.1016/S0010-7824(01)00284-0
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Progestogen-only contraceptive implants are highly effective. In most studies, 5-year cumulative pregnancy rates are less than 1.5/100 women for Norplant and Norplant II. No study has yet reported any failures with Implanon. Weight over 70 kg and age at insertion under 25 years both increase the failure rate of Norplant and Norplant 11; however, data are as yet lacking for Implanon. The effectiveness of other progestogen-only implants for which there are as yet few data are unlikely to be any different. Continuation rates are high compared with other hormonal methods and with the intrauterine device. In most cohorts at least 35% of women, and often many more, are still using Norplant by the end of 5 years. Rates vary according to a number of factors, including population studied, age, and parity. Menstrual disturbance is by far the most common reason for discontinuation, with headache, acne, weight gain, and desire for pregnancy accounting for other common reasons for implant removal. Fertility returns rapidly following implant removal, and pregnancy rates (76-100% 1 year after removal) are usually no different from those following discontinuation of any other contraceptive method. There is no increase in the risk of ectopic pregnancy, fetal malformation, or impaired infant health in pregnancies conceived either during implant use or after removal. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:29 / 37
页数:9
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]   The use of nomegestrol acetate subdermal contraceptive implant, uniplant, during lactation [J].
AbdelAleem, H ;
AbolOyoun, ESM ;
Shaaban, MM ;
ElSaeed, M ;
Shoukry, M ;
Makhlouf, A ;
Salem, HT .
CONTRACEPTION, 1996, 54 (05) :281-286
[2]   RETRACTED: An integrated analysis of vaginal bleeding patterns in clinical trials of Implanon® (Retracted Article) [J].
Affandi, B .
CONTRACEPTION, 1998, 58 (06) :99S-107S
[3]   PREGNANCY AFTER REMOVAL OF NORPLANT IMPLANTS CONTRACEPTIVE [J].
AFFANDI, B ;
SANTOSO, SSI ;
DJAJADILAGA ;
HADISAPUTRA, W ;
MOELOEK, FA ;
PRIHARTONO, J ;
LUBIS, F ;
SAMIL, RS .
CONTRACEPTION, 1987, 36 (02) :203-209
[4]   RETRACTED: A pilot efficacy study with a single-rod contraceptive implant (Implanon®) in 200 Indonesian women treated for ≤4 years (Retracted Article) [J].
Affandi, B ;
Korver, T ;
Geurts, TBP ;
Bennink, HJTC .
CONTRACEPTION, 1999, 59 (03) :167-174
[5]   5-YEAR EXPERIENCE WITH NORPLANT [J].
AFFANDI, B ;
SANTOSO, SSI ;
DJAJADILAGA ;
HADISAPUTRA, W ;
MOELOEK, FA ;
PRIHARTONO, J ;
LUBIS, F ;
SAMIL, RS .
CONTRACEPTION, 1987, 36 (04) :417-428
[6]  
AFFANDI B, 1999, MED J INDONESIA, V8, P56
[7]   A 5-YEAR CLINICAL-EVALUATION OF NORPLANT(R) CONTRACEPTIVE SUBDERMAL IMPLANTS IN BANGLADESHI ACCEPTORS [J].
AKHTER, H ;
DUNSON, TR ;
AMATYA, RN ;
BEGUM, K ;
CHOWDHURY, T ;
DIGHE, N ;
KRUEGER, SL ;
RAHMAN, S .
CONTRACEPTION, 1993, 47 (06) :569-582
[8]  
[Anonymous], 1999, Medical Journal of Indonesia, DOI DOI 10.13181/MJI.V8I1.950
[9]   Contraceptive outcomes among adolescents prescribed Norplant implants versus oral contraceptives after one year of use [J].
Berenson, AB ;
Wiemann, CM ;
Rickerr, VI ;
McCombs, SL .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1997, 176 (03) :586-592
[10]   OVARIAN ENDOCRINE FUNCTION THROUGH 5 YEARS OF CONTINUOUS TREATMENT WITH NORPLANT SUBDERMAL CONTRACEPTIVE IMPLANTS [J].
BRACHE, V ;
ALVAREZSANCHEZ, F ;
FAUNDES, A ;
TEJADA, AS ;
COCHON, L .
CONTRACEPTION, 1990, 41 (02) :169-177