Superior prolonged antiemetic prophylaxis with a four-drug multimodal regimen -: comparison with propofol or placebo

被引:47
作者
Hammas, B
Thörn, SE
Wattwil, M [2 ]
机构
[1] Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Med & Care, Linkoping, Sweden
[2] Orebro Med Ctr Hosp, Dept Anesthesia & Intens Care, SE-70185 Orebro, Sweden
关键词
dexamethasone; droperidol; metoclopramide; ondansetron; postoperative nausea and vomiting; propofol;
D O I
10.1034/j.1399-6576.2002.460302.x
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background: The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of a low-dose propofol infusion with a four-drug multimodal regimen for prophylaxis of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). Methods: POW was studied in two patient groups with a known high incidence. Through a stratified randomization, 60 patients undergoing breast surgery and 120 patients undergoing abdominal surgery were randomized to three groups of equal size: the propofol group (P), the multidrug group (M) and the control group (C). All patients received general anesthesia, induction with propofol and maintenance with sevoflurane. After induction, patients in the P group received a continuous infusion of propofol 1 mg/kg/h during the operation and the first 4 postoperative h. Patients in the M group received dexamethasone 4 mg and three antiemetics, ondansetron 4 mg, droperidol 1.25 mg and metoclopramide 10 mg i.v. In the control group no prophylaxis was given. Nausea and pain were evaluated by incidence and a visual analog scale (0-10 cm). All emetic episodes were noted by the staff during the first 4 h and by the patients during the next 20 h. Results: The overall incidence of PONV during the first 24 h postoperatively was significantly lower in the M group (24%) than in the P group (49%) (P < 0.01) or the C group (70%) (P < 0.001). The incidence of PONV increased significantly both in patients undergoing breast surgery and abdominal surgery after termination of propofol. The number of patients who vomited was significantly lower in the M group, both in breast surgery patients (5%) and abdominal surgery patients (3%) compared to patients in the propofol groups (breast 16% NS; abdominal 29%, P < 0.05) and in the control groups (breast 37%, P < 0.01; abdominal 29%, P < 0.01). Conclusion: The incidence of PONV is very high in patients undergoing breast and abdominal surgery. In the present study antiemetic prophylaxis with a combination of droperidol, ondansetron, metoclopramide and dexamethasone was more effective in preventing PONV, especially vomiting, than a postoperative low-dose infusion of propofol, which had a short lasting effect.
引用
收藏
页码:232 / 237
页数:6
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]   Betamethasone reduces postoperative pain and nausea after ambulatory surgery [J].
Aasboe, V ;
Raeder, JC ;
Groegaard, B .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1998, 87 (02) :319-323
[2]  
BORGEAT A, 1992, ANESTH ANALG, V74, P539
[3]  
BORGEAT A, 1994, ANESTHESIOLOGY, V80, P642
[4]   Propofol maintenance to reduce postoperative emesis in thyroidectomy patients: A group sequential comparison with isoflurane/nitrous oxide [J].
Brooker, CD ;
Sutherland, J ;
Cousins, MJ .
ANAESTHESIA AND INTENSIVE CARE, 1998, 26 (06) :625-629
[5]  
Cox F, 1999, Br J Theatre Nurs, V9, P556
[6]   Omission of nitrous oxide during anesthesia reduces the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting - A meta-analysis [J].
Divatia, JV ;
Vaidya, JS ;
Badwe, RA ;
Hawaldar, RW .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1996, 85 (05) :1055-1062
[7]   Comparative efficacy and safety of ondansetron, droperidol, and metoclopramide for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting: A meta-analysis [J].
Domino, KB ;
Anderson, EA ;
Polissar, NL ;
Posner, KL .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1999, 88 (06) :1370-1379
[8]   THE INFLUENCE OF PROPOFOL ON VOMITING INDUCED BY APOMORPHINE [J].
HVARFNER, A ;
HAMMAS, B ;
THORN, SE ;
WATTWIL, M .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1995, 80 (05) :967-969
[9]  
MCCOLLUM JSC, 1988, ANAESTHESIA, V43, P239
[10]   The safety and efficacy of prophylactic ondansetron in patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy [J].
Sadhasivam, S ;
Saxena, A ;
Kathirvel, S ;
Kannan, TR ;
Trikha, A ;
Mohan, V .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1999, 89 (06) :1340-1345