An Evidence-Based Systematic Review on Cognitive Interventions for Individuals With Dementia

被引:58
作者
Hopper, Tammy [1 ]
Bourgeois, Michelle [2 ]
Pimentel, Jane [3 ]
Qualls, Constance Dean [4 ]
Hickey, Ellen [5 ]
Frymark, Tobi
Schooling, Tracy
机构
[1] Univ Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
[2] Ohio State Univ, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[3] Eastern Washington Univ, Spokane, WA USA
[4] SUNY Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14260 USA
[5] Dalhousie Univ, Halifax, NS, Canada
关键词
Alzheimer's disease; dementia; cognitive intervention; speech-language pathology; LONG-TERM EFFECTIVENESS; FACE-NAME ASSOCIATIONS; ALZHEIMERS-DISEASE; PRACTICE RECOMMENDATIONS; SPACED-RETRIEVAL; OLDER-ADULTS; MEMORY INTERVENTION; ERRORLESS; WORKING; REHABILITATION;
D O I
10.1044/1058-0360(2012/11-0137)
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100103 [病原生物学]; 100213 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate the current state of research evidence related to cognitive interventions for individuals with Alzheimer's disease or related dementias. Method: A systematic search of the literature was conducted across 27 electronic databases based on a set of a priori questions, inclusion/exclusion criteria, and search parameters. Studies were appraised for methodological quality and categorized according to intervention technique and outcome (e. g., cognitive-communication impairment or activity limitation/participation restriction). Results were summarized and, when possible, analyzed quantitatively using indicators of treatment effect size. Results: Forty-three studies met criteria for inclusion in the review. The most commonly used cognitive intervention techniques used were errorless learning, spaced-retrieval training, vanishing cues, or verbal instruction/cueing. Most treatment outcomes were measured at the cognitive-communication impairment level of functioning and were generally positive. However, results should be interpreted cautiously because of methodological limitations across studies. Conclusions: Research evidence to support the use of cognitive interventions for individuals with dementia is accumulating. Researchers are beginning to evaluate treatment efficacy, yet the focus tends to be on discovery, specifically, refining intervention variables that will facilitate optimal outcomes. Implications for clinical practice and avenues for future research are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:126 / 145
页数:20
相关论文
共 81 条
[1]
*AM SPEECH LANG HE, 2007, SCOP PRACT SPEECH LA
[2]
American Psychiatric Association, 2013, Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, DOI 10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596
[3]
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, 2011, SLP HEALTHC SURV 201
[4]
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, 2003, KNOWL SKILLS NEED SP
[5]
Andrews-Salvia M, 2003, J MED SPEECH-LANG PA, V11, P51
[6]
[Anonymous], ALZH DIS FACTS FIG
[7]
[Anonymous], 2001, ICF INT CLASFUNCT
[8]
Auer S., 1995, MODIFIED ORDINAL SCA
[9]
Does expanded retrieval produce benefits over equal-interval spacing? Explorations of spacing effects in healthy aging and early stage Alzheimer's disease [J].
Balota, DA ;
Duchek, JM ;
Sergent-Marshall, SD ;
Roediger, HL .
PSYCHOLOGY AND AGING, 2006, 21 (01) :19-31
[10]
Bayles KA, 2005, J MED SPEECH-LANG PA, V13, pXIII