Radiation therapy alone in stage III-B cancer of the uterine cervix - A 17-year experience in Southern Brazil

被引:10
作者
Ferreira, PRF [1 ]
Braga, A [1 ]
Barletta, A [1 ]
Ilha, LA [1 ]
机构
[1] Pontificia Univ Catolica Rio Grande do Sul, Hosp Sao Lucas PUC, Dept Radiotherapy, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS | 1999年 / 45卷 / 02期
关键词
stage III-B uterine neoplasms; radiation oncology; brachytherapy; curietherapy;
D O I
10.1016/S0360-3016(99)00178-9
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: External irradiation followed by intracavitary therapy (EBIC) has been considered the standard treatment for stage III-B cancer of the uterine cervix. For different reasons, some patients are not suited for intracavitary therapy (ICT), and the treatment may be given entirely by external beam irradiation alone (EBRTA). The purpose of our study is to discuss treatment results and complications for patients undergoing EBIC or EBRTA. Methods and Materials: A retrospective study was carried out on 202 eligible patients with stage III-B cancer of the uterine cervix admitted for radiotherapy from 1980-1997. Ninety-three patients were able to receive EBIC (50 Gy, 8 MV RX whole pelvis followed by one session of 38-45 Gy ICT to point A). The remaining received EBRTA (50-70 Gy for 5-9 or more weeks). Median follow-up procedure was 18.5 months (range: 4-182) for all patients and 26 months (range 4-147) for the patients at risk. Results: The most frequent reason for precluding ICT was large residual tumor volume (32.1%). Ten-year overall survival rates, relapse free survival, and pelvic failure rate for the EBIC and EBRTA patients were, respectively, 22.5% x 15.6% (p = 0.0087), 23.5% x 14.8% (p = 0.005), and 51.6% x 68.8% (p = 0.005). However, when the same comparisons were performed with EBIC patients x EBRTA patients receiving a high dose schedule (60 Gy/6-8 wk to 70 Gy/7-9 wk), the results of the EBIC group remained higher, but the differences became insignificant: respectively, 22.5% x 18.9% (p = 0.17), 23.5% x 15.3% (p = 0.052), and 51.6% x 60.0% (p = 0.10). The distribution of complications was similar in both groups. Conclusions: We found that EBIC was the best treatment modality in our patients with stage III-B cancer of the uterine cervix, whereas for patients who were not candidates for ICT, EBRTA with a high dose schedule appears to be an efficient and safe alternative. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:441 / 446
页数:6
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   CARCINOMA OF THE UTERINE CERVIX TREATED WITH EXTERNAL IRRADIATION ALONE [J].
AKINE, Y ;
HASHIDA, I ;
KAJIURA, Y ;
WATAI, K ;
TSUKIYAMA, I ;
EGAWA, S ;
YAMADA, T ;
TANEMURA, K ;
TSUNEMATSU, R ;
OHMI, K ;
MATSUMOTO, Y ;
SONODA, T ;
KASAMATSU, T .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1986, 12 (09) :1611-1616
[2]   CARCINOMA OF CERVIX TREATED BY EXTERNAL IRRADIATION ALONE [J].
CASTRO, JR ;
ISSA, P ;
FLETCHER, GH .
RADIOLOGY, 1970, 95 (01) :163-&
[3]  
COIA L, 1990, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V66, P2451, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19901215)66:12<2451::AID-CNCR2820661202>3.0.CO
[4]  
2-5
[5]  
COX DR, 1972, J R STAT SOC B, V34, P187
[6]   TOXICITY CRITERIA OF THE RADIATION-THERAPY ONCOLOGY GROUP (RTOG) AND THE EUROPEAN-ORGANIZATION-FOR-RESEARCH-AND-TREATMENT-OF-CANCER (EORTC) [J].
COX, JD ;
STETZ, J ;
PAJAK, TF .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1995, 31 (05) :1341-1346
[7]   Are recommendations from carcinoma of the cervix patterns of care studies (PCS) in the United States of America (USA) applicable to centers in developing countries? [J].
Craighead, PS ;
Smulian, HG ;
deGroot, HJ ;
duToit, PFM .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1997, 37 (04) :803-810
[8]  
Eifel Patricia J., 1996, International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics, V36, P217, DOI 10.1016/S0360-3016(97)85459-4
[9]  
Eifel Patricia J., 1997, P1433
[10]  
*FUND NAC SAUD, 1997, MORT BRAZ 1994, P6