Minimally Invasive Foraminotomy Through Tubular Retractors via a Contralateral Approach in Patients With Unilateral Radiculopathy

被引:34
作者
Alimi, Marjan [1 ]
Njoku, Innocent, Jr. [2 ]
Cong, Guang-Ting [2 ]
Pyo, Se Young [1 ]
Hofstetter, Christoph P. [1 ]
Grunert, Peter [1 ]
Haertl, Roger [1 ]
机构
[1] New York Presbyterian Hosp, Weill Cornell Med Coll, Dept Neurol Surg, Weill Cornell Brain & Spine Ctr, New York, NY 10065 USA
[2] Weill Cornell Med Coll, New York, NY USA
关键词
Contralateral approach; Foraminal stenosis; Foraminotomy; Lumbar spine; Minimally invasive; Unilateral radiculopathy; Visual Analogue Scale;
D O I
10.1227/NEU.0000000000000358
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
100204 [神经病学];
摘要
BACKGROUND: Radiculopathy caused by foraminal nerve root compression is a common pathology in the lumbar spine. Surgical decompression via a conventional open foraminotomy is the treatment of choice when surgery is indicated. Minimally invasive tubular foraminotomy through a contralateral approach is a potentially effective surgical alternative. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this retrospective cohort study was to evaluate the efficacy and benefits of this approach for treatment of radiculopathy. METHODS: Patients with unilaterally dominant lower extremity radiculopathy, who underwent minimally invasive lumbar foraminotomy through tubular retractors via a contralateral approach between 2010 and 2012, were included. Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for back and leg pain were evaluated preoperatively, postoperatively, and at the latest follow-up. Functional outcome was evaluated by using the MacNab criteria. RESULTS: For the total 32 patients, postoperatively there was significant improvement in the ODI (P = .006), VAS back pain (P < .001), and VAS leg pain on the pathology and the approach side (P = .004, P = .021, respectively). At follow-up of 12.3 +/- 1.7 months, there was also significant improvement in the ODI (P < .001), VAS back pain (P = .001), and VAS leg pain on the pathology and the approach side (P < .001, P = .001, respectively). The functional outcome was excellent and good in 95.2%. One patient required fusion (3.1%). CONCLUSION: A minimally invasive, facet-sparing contralateral approach is an effective technique for treatment of radiculopathy due to foraminal compression. It also allows for decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis and bilateral lateral recess decompression without the need for fusion.
引用
收藏
页码:436 / 446
页数:11
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]
SURGICAL-MANAGEMENT OF EXTREME LATERAL LUMBAR-DISK HERNIATIONS - REVIEW OF 138 CASES [J].
ABDULLAH, AF ;
WOLBER, PGH ;
WARFIELD, JR ;
GUNADI, IK .
NEUROSURGERY, 1988, 22 (04) :648-653
[2]
Microsurgical nerve root canal widening without fusion for lumbosacral intervertebral foraminal stenosis: Technical notes and early results [J].
Baba, H ;
Uchida, K ;
Maezawa, Y ;
Furusawa, N ;
Okumura, Y ;
Imura, S .
SPINAL CORD, 1996, 34 (11) :644-650
[3]
MEASURING THE FUNCTIONAL STATUS OF PATIENTS WITH LOW-BACK-PAIN - ASSESSMENT OF THE QUALITY OF 4 DISEASE-SPECIFIC QUESTIONNAIRES [J].
BEURSKENS, AJ ;
DEVET, HC ;
KOKE, AJ ;
VANDERHEIJDEN, GJ ;
KNIPSCHILD, PG .
SPINE, 1995, 20 (09) :1017-1028
[4]
BRIGGS H, 1945, J BONE JOINT SURG, V27, P475
[5]
Cervellini P, 2005, ACTA NEUROCHIR SUPPL, V92, P99
[6]
Facet-sparing Decompression With a Minimally Invasive Flexible Microblade Shaver A Prospective Operative Analysis [J].
Dickinson, Lawrence D. ;
Phelps, Jeffery ;
Summa, Christopher D. ;
Vanichkachorn, Jed S. ;
Jeshuran, Winston R. ;
Randall, Jeffrey B. ;
Mimran, Ronnie I. ;
Mitchell, Michelle ;
Macenski, Mitchell M. ;
Lauryssen, Carl .
JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS & TECHNIQUES, 2013, 26 (08) :427-436
[7]
EVALUATION OF VARIED SURGICAL APPROACHES USED IN THE MANAGEMENT OF 170 FAR-LATERAL LUMBAR DISC HERNIATIONS - INDICATIONS AND RESULTS [J].
EPSTEIN, NE .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 1995, 83 (04) :648-656
[8]
Foraminal and far lateral lumbar disc herniations: surgical alternatives and outcome measures [J].
Epstein, NE .
SPINAL CORD, 2002, 40 (10) :491-500
[9]
Clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity measured on an 11-point numerical pain rating scale [J].
Farrar, JT ;
Young, JP ;
LaMoreaux, L ;
Werth, JL ;
Poole, RM .
PAIN, 2001, 94 (02) :149-158
[10]
Defining the clinically important difference in pain outcome measures [J].
Farrar, JT ;
Portenoy, RK ;
Berlin, JA ;
Kinman, JL ;
Strom, BL .
PAIN, 2000, 88 (03) :287-294