Current practice in measuring usability:: Challenges to usability studies and research

被引:518
作者
Hornbæk, K [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Copenhagen, Dept Comp Sci, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
关键词
usability; user-centered design; Usability Engineering;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijhcs.2005.06.002
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
How to measure usability is an important question in HCI research and user interface evaluation. We review current practice in measuring usability by categorizing and discussing usability measures from 180 studies published in core HCI journals and proceedings. The discussion distinguish several problems with the measures, including whether they actually measure usability, if they cover usability broadly, how they are reasoned about, and if they meet recommendations on how to measure usability. In many studies, the choice of and reasoning about usability measures fall short of a valid and reliable account of usability as quality-in-use of the user interface being studied. Based on the review, we discuss challenges for studies of usability and for research into how to measure usability. The challenges are to distinguish and empirically compare subjective and objective measures of usability; to focus on developing and employing measures of learning and retention; to study long-term use and usability; to extend measures of satisfaction beyond post-use questionnaires; to validate and standardize the host of subjective satisfaction questionnaires used; to study correlations between usability measures as a means for validation; and to use both micro and macro tasks and corresponding measures of usability. In conclusion, we argue that increased attention to the problems identified and challenges discussed may strengthen studies of usability and usability research. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:79 / 102
页数:24
相关论文
共 112 条
[1]  
ALLANSON J, 2002, ACM C HUM FACT COMP, P912
[2]  
*AM PSYCH ASS, 1985, STAND PSYCH TEST
[3]  
Amabile T. M, 1996, CREATIVITY CONTEXT
[4]   Subjective rating scales: science or art? [J].
Annett, J .
ERGONOMICS, 2002, 45 (14) :966-987
[5]  
[Anonymous], P ACM C HUM FACT COM
[6]  
Bailey BP, 2001, HUMAN-COMPUTER INTERACTION - INTERACT'01, P593
[7]  
Basdogan C., 2000, ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, V7, P443, DOI 10.1145/365058.365082
[8]  
BAYLES ME, 2002, P SIGCHI C HUM FACT, P363
[9]  
BENNETT JL, 1972, ANNU REV INFORM SCI, V7, P159
[10]  
BENNETT JL, 1979, MAN COMPUTER COMMUNI, V2, P1