Timing of insurance coverage and use of prenatal care among low-income women

被引:53
作者
Egerter, S
Braveman, P
Marchi, K
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Family & Community Med, Sch Med, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[2] Univ Calif San Francisco, Sch Med, Inst Hlth Policy Studies, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2105/AJPH.92.3.423
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objectives. This study examined the relationship between timing of insurance coverage and prenatal care among low-income women. Methods. Timeliness of prenatal care initiation and adequacy of number of visits were studied among 5455 low-income participants in a larger cross-sectional statewide survey of postpartum women in California during 1994-1995. Results. Although only 2% of women remained uninsured throughout pregnancy, one fifth lacked coverage during the first trimester. Rates of untimely care were highest ( greater than or equal to64%) among women who were uninsured throughout their pregnancy or whose coverage began after the first trimester; rates were lowest (about 10%) among women who obtained coverage during the first trimester, Women who first obtained Medi-Cal coverage during pregnancy were at low risk of having too few visits. Conclusions. Timing of prenatal coverage should be considered in research on the relationship between coverage and care use among low-income women. Earlier studies that relied solely on principal payer information, without data on when coverage began, may have led to inaccurate inferences about lack of coverage as a barrier to prenatal care.
引用
收藏
页码:423 / 427
页数:5
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]   Barriers to timely prenatal care among women with insurance: The importance of prepregnancy factors [J].
Braveman, P ;
Marchi, K ;
Egerter, S ;
Pearl, M ;
Neuhaus, J .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2000, 95 (06) :874-880
[2]   ACCESS TO PRENATAL-CARE FOLLOWING MAJOR MEDICAID ELIGIBILITY EXPANSIONS [J].
BRAVEMAN, P ;
BENNETT, T ;
LEWIS, C ;
EGERTER, S ;
SHOWSTACK, J .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1993, 269 (10) :1285-1289
[3]   The prevalence of low income among childbearing women in California: Implications for the private and public sectors [J].
Braveman, P ;
Egerter, S ;
Marchi, K .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1999, 89 (06) :868-874
[4]   Prenatal care for low-income women enrolled in a managed-care organization [J].
Gazmararian, JA ;
Arrington, TL ;
Bailey, CM ;
Schwarz, KS ;
Koplan, JP .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1999, 94 (02) :177-184
[5]   THE MEDICAID ELIGIBILITY EXPANSIONS FOR PREGNANT-WOMEN - EVALUATING THE STRENGTH OF STATE IMPLEMENTATION EFFORTS [J].
GOLD, RB ;
SINGH, S ;
FROST, J .
FAMILY PLANNING PERSPECTIVES, 1993, 25 (05) :196-207
[6]   THE EFFECT OF PROVIDING HEALTH COVERAGE TO POOR UNINSURED PREGNANT-WOMEN IN MASSACHUSETTS [J].
HAAS, JS ;
UDVARHELYI, IS ;
MORRIS, CN ;
EPSTEIN, AM .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1993, 269 (01) :87-91
[7]   THE ADEQUACY OF PRENATAL-CARE AND INCIDENCE OF LOW-BIRTH-WEIGHT AMONG THE POOR IN WASHINGTON-STATE AND BRITISH-COLUMBIA [J].
KATZ, SJ ;
ARMSTRONG, RW ;
LOGERFO, JP .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1994, 84 (06) :986-991
[8]   AN EVALUATION OF THE KESSNER ADEQUACY OF PRENATAL-CARE INDEX AND A PROPOSED ADEQUACY OF PRENATAL-CARE UTILIZATION INDEX [J].
KOTELCHUCK, M .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1994, 84 (09) :1414-1420
[9]  
*NAT CTR HLTH STAT, 1997, HLTH PEOPL 2000 REV
[10]  
*NAT GOV ASS, 1994, STAT COV PREGN WOM C