Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: A long-term follow-up

被引:113
作者
Finocchiaro, C
Galletti, R
Rovera, G
Ferrari, A
Todros, L
Vuolo, A
Balzola, F
机构
[1] MOLINETTE MAURIZIANO HOSP,DEPT GASTROENTEROL & CLIN NUTR,I-10126 TURIN,ITALY
[2] MOLINETTE MAURIZIANO HOSP,DEPT INTERNAL MED,I-10126 TURIN,ITALY
关键词
PEG; enteral feeding; follow-up; complications; survival;
D O I
10.1016/S0899-9007(97)00030-0
中图分类号
R15 [营养卫生、食品卫生]; TS201 [基础科学];
学科分类号
100403 [营养与食品卫生学];
摘要
Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is the preferred method of long-term tube feeding, but only a few studies describe a long-term follow-up. The purpose of this study is to analyze the follow-up of PEG enteral feeling patients in the long term, and to report on the complication and survival rates. Between January 1991 and June 1995, eve studied 136 patients (49% cancer and 51% non-cancer patients; male = 68%, female = 32%) after PEG insertion. One hundred twenty-eight patients had a long-term follow-up of over 31 d. The mean duration of PEG feeding was 277 +/- 358 d (range 31-1590): 17% of patients returned to oral feeding, 34% continued enteral nutrition and 49% died. Major complications occurred in 3% of the patients: 1 aspiration pneumonia, 1 subcutaneous abscess, 2 buried bumper syndrome. Minor complications arose in 14% of our cases: 8 tube blockages, 4 tube dislodgements, 6 site infections. For the whole group of 136 patients, survival probabilities after PEG insertion at 1, 6, 12, and 24 mo were 90.5%, 52%, 42%, and 35%, respectively. After 180 d, the difference in survival probabilities between cancer and non-cancer patients became significant (P < 0.02). Median survival probability was 64% for non-cancer and 39% for cancer patients, and this trend did not chance over 2 y. (C)Elsevier Science inc. 1997.
引用
收藏
页码:520 / 523
页数:4
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]
EFFICACY OF TUBE-FEEDING IN SUPPLYING ENERGY-REQUIREMENTS OF HOSPITALIZED-PATIENTS [J].
ABERNATHY, GB ;
HEIZER, WD ;
HOLCOMBE, BJ ;
RAASCH, RH ;
SCHLEGEL, KE ;
HAK, LJ .
JOURNAL OF PARENTERAL AND ENTERAL NUTRITION, 1989, 13 (04) :387-391
[2]
CHUNG RS, 1990, AM SURGEON, V56, P134
[3]
COSENTINO F, 1993, GIORNA ITAL END DIG, V16, P181
[4]
DAVIS D, 1991, GASTROINTESTINAL E A, V19, P236
[5]
FERRARI A, 1994, GASTROINTEST ENDOSC, V2, P8
[6]
Finocchiaro E, 1993, Minerva Gastroenterol Dietol, V39, P23
[7]
FORGARC I, 1992, BRIT MED J, V17, P175
[8]
GOUTCH PG, 1986, J CLIN GASTROENTEROL, V8, P10
[10]
COMPARISON OF PERCUTANEOUS ENDOSCOPIC GASTROSTOMY WITH STAMM GASTROSTOMY [J].
GRANT, JP .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1988, 207 (05) :598-603