Midfoot field block anesthesia with monitored intravenous sedation in forefoot surgery

被引:8
作者
Ptaszek, AJ [1 ]
Morris, SG
Brodsky, JW
机构
[1] Wilford Hall USAF Med Ctr, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Lackland AFB, TX 78236 USA
[2] Orthopaed Surg E, Birmingham, AL USA
[3] Baylor Univ, Med Ctr, Dallas, TX USA
关键词
D O I
10.1177/107110079902000908
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
rifty consecutive patients, studied prospectively, underwent an elective first metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis or proximal metatarsal osteotomy and modified McBride bunionectomy, with or without concomitant lesser toe procedures. A field block was administered only at and distal to the level of the tarsometatarsal joints using 30 cc equal parts 0.25% bupivacaine and 1% lidocaine without epinephrine. Before injection, the monitoring anesthesiologist gave the patient intravenous (IV) sedation, usually an amnestic agent. Narcotic analgesia was not given to any patient before or during surgery to evaluate the efficacy of the block. Detailed records were kept of all intraoperative medication and its dosage, including supplemental local anesthetic. Efficacy and outcome were measured via direct patient monitoring during surgery and by direct interview after surgery, first in the recovery area (visual pain analogue applied) and again at 24 to 48 hr after surgery (recollection of events, duration of block, use of narcotics after surgery, subjective patient satisfaction). Supplemental local anesthetic was required for 15 patients (primarily for those who underwent lesser toe procedures), IV narcotic was required for 3 patients, and conversion to general anesthesia was required for 4 patients for agitation, not pain. The average duration of the local block was 8 hr (range, 5-14 hr); none of the patients had recall of negative events, and overall patient satisfaction was 98%. Midfoot blocks are easy to administer and provide reliable anesthesia for reconstructive forefoot surgery. Monitored IV sedation enhances patient acceptance, facilitates block administration, and provides a valuable measure of patient safety and comfort.
引用
收藏
页码:583 / 586
页数:4
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
BESKIN JL, 1987, ORTHOPEDICS, V10, P109
[2]  
CARPENTER RL, 1992, CLIN ANESTH, P509
[3]  
COHEN SJ, 1991, J DERMATOL SURG ONC, V17, P527
[4]  
DEANDRES J, 1995, REGION ANESTH, V20, P509
[5]  
KIM D, 1993, ORTHOPEDICS, V10, P1109
[6]  
KOFOED H, 1982, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P97
[7]  
Lee TH, 1996, ORTHOPEDICS, V19, P577
[8]   INTRAVENOUS LIDOCAINE FOR ANESTHESIA IN THE LOWER-EXTREMITY - A PROSPECTIVE-STUDY [J].
LEHMAN, WL ;
JONES, WW .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1984, 66A (07) :1056-1060
[9]   THE PNEUMATIC ANKLE TOURNIQUET WITH ANKLE BLOCK ANESTHESIA FOR FOOT SURGERY [J].
LICHTENFELD, NS .
FOOT & ANKLE, 1992, 13 (06) :344-349
[10]   REGIONAL ANESTHESIA FOR FOOT AND ANKLE SURGERY [J].
MYERSON, MS ;
RULAND, CM ;
ALLON, SM .
FOOT & ANKLE, 1992, 13 (05) :282-288