Constructing and evaluating balanced portfolios of R&D projects with interactions: A DEA based methodology

被引:154
作者
Eilat, H [1 ]
Golany, B [1 ]
Shtub, A [1 ]
机构
[1] Technion Israel Inst Technol, Fac Ind Engn & Management, IL-32000 Haifa, Israel
关键词
data envelopment analysis; R&D projects; portfolio analysis; balanced scorecard;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejor.2004.12.001
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
We propose and demonstrate a methodology for the construction and analysis of efficient, effective and balanced portfolios of R&D projects with interactions. The methodology is based on an extended data envelopment analysis (DEA) model that quantifies some the qualitative concepts embedded in the balanced scorecard (BSC) approach. The methodology includes a resource allocation scheme, an evaluation of individual projects, screening of projects based on their relative values and on portfolio requirements, and finally a construction and evaluation of portfolios. The DEA-BSC model is employed in two versions, first to evaluate individual R&D projects, and then to evaluate alternative R&D portfolios. To generate portfolio alternatives, we apply a branch-and-bound algorithm, and use an accumulation function that accounts for possible interactions among projects. The entire methodology is illustrated via an example in the context of a governmental agency charged with selecting technological projects. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1018 / 1039
页数:22
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]   Weights restrictions and value judgements in data envelopment analysis: Evolution, development and future directions [J].
Allen, R ;
Athanassopoulos, A ;
Dyson, RG ;
Thanassoulis, E .
ANNALS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 1997, 73 (0) :13-34
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1992, The Balanced Scorecard-Measures that Drive Performance The Balanced Scorecard-Measures
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1996, USING BALANCED SCORE
[4]  
[Anonymous], 3 GEN R D MANAGING L
[5]  
ANTHONY RN, 1980, MANAGEMENT CONTROL N
[6]   RECENT ADVANCES IN R AND D BENEFIT MEASUREMENT AND PROJECT SELECTION METHODS [J].
BAKER, N ;
FREELAND, J .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE SERIES B-APPLICATION, 1975, 21 (10) :1164-1175
[7]   R AND D PROJECT SELECTION MODELS - ASSESSMENT [J].
BAKER, NR .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, 1974, EM21 (04) :165-171
[8]   AN INTERACTIVE APPROACH TO R-AND-D PROJECT SELECTION AND TERMINATION [J].
BARD, JF ;
BALACHANDRA, R ;
KAUFMANN, PE .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, 1988, 35 (03) :139-146
[9]   Optimal resource allocation with minimum activation levels and fixed costs [J].
Basso, A ;
Peccati, LA .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2001, 131 (03) :536-549
[10]  
Beaujon GJ, 2001, NAV RES LOG, V48, P18, DOI 10.1002/1520-6750(200102)48:1<18::AID-NAV2>3.0.CO