Accommodation with higher-order monochromatic aberrations corrected with adaptive optics

被引:88
作者
Chen, L
Kruger, PB
Hofer, H
Singer, B
Williams, DR
机构
[1] Univ Rochester, Ctr Visual Sci, Rochester, NY 14627 USA
[2] SUNY Coll Optometry, Schnurmacher Inst Vis Res, New York, NY 10036 USA
[3] Princeton Univ, Ctr Brain Mind & Behav, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1364/JOSAA.23.000001
中图分类号
O43 [光学];
学科分类号
070207 ; 0803 ;
摘要
Higher-order monochromatic aberrations in the human eye cause a difference in the appearance of stimuli at distances nearer and farther from best focus that could serve as a signed error signal for accommodation. We explored whether higher-order monochromatic aberrations affect the accommodative response to 0.5 D step changes in vergence in experiments in which these aberrations were either present as they normally are or removed with adaptive optics. Of six subjects, one could not accommodate at all for steps in either condition. One subject clearly required higher-order aberrations to accommodate at all. The remaining four subjects could accommodate in the correct direction even when higher-order aberrations were removed. No subjects improved their accommodation when higher-order aberrations were corrected, indicating that the corresponding decrease in the depth of field of the eye did not improve the accommodative response. These results are consistent with previous findings of large individual differences in the ability to accommodate in impoverished conditions. These results suggest that at least some subjects can use monochromatic higher-order aberrations to guide accommodation. They also show that some subjects can accommodate correctly when higher-order monochromatic aberrations as well as established cues to accommodation are greatly reduced. (c) 2006 Optical Society of America.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 8
页数:8
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] SPECTRAL BANDWIDTH AND OCULAR ACCOMMODATION
    AGGARWALA, KR
    KRUGER, ES
    MATHEWS, S
    KRUGER, PB
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE OPTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA A-OPTICS IMAGE SCIENCE AND VISION, 1995, 12 (03): : 450 - 455
  • [2] ALLEN M J, 1955, Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom, V32, P422
  • [3] Applegate RA, 2001, INVEST OPHTH VIS SCI, V42, pS604
  • [4] FLUCTUATIONS OF ACCOMMODATION UNDER STEADY VIEWING CONDITIONS
    CAMPBELL, FW
    ROBSON, JG
    WESTHEIMER, G
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 1959, 145 (03): : 579 - 594
  • [5] DYNAMICS OF ACCOMODATION RESPONSES OF THE HUMAN EYE
    CAMPBELL, FW
    WESTHEIMER, G
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 1960, 151 (02): : 285 - 295
  • [6] FACTORS INFLUENCING ACCOMODATION RESPONSES OF THE HUMAN EYE
    CAMPBELL, FW
    WESTHEIMER, G
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE OPTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1959, 49 (06) : 568 - 571
  • [7] FLUCTUATIONS IN ACCOMMODATION - A REVIEW
    CHARMAN, WN
    HERON, G
    [J]. OPHTHALMIC AND PHYSIOLOGICAL OPTICS, 1988, 8 (02) : 153 - 164
  • [8] Predicting subjective judgment of best focus with objective image quality metrics
    Cheng, X
    Bradley, A
    Thibos, LN
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VISION, 2004, 4 (04): : 310 - 321
  • [9] Test-retest reliability of clinical Shack-Hartmann measurements
    Cheng, X
    Himebaugh, NL
    Kollbaum, PS
    Thibos, LN
    Bradley, A
    [J]. INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2004, 45 (01) : 351 - 360
  • [10] Fernandez EJ, 2002, INVEST OPHTH VIS SCI, V43, pU209