Mobility status during inpatient rehabilitation: A comparison of patients with stroke and traumatic brain injury

被引:15
作者
Eng, JJ
Rowe, SJ
McLaren, LM
机构
[1] Univ British Columbia, Sch Rehabil Sci, Vancouver, BC VT6 2B5, Canada
[2] Gf Strong Rehab Ctr, Rehabil Res Lab, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[3] Gf Strong Rehab Ctr, Acquired Brain Injury Program, Vancouver, BC, Canada
来源
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION | 2002年 / 83卷 / 04期
关键词
brain injuries; outcome assessment (health care); rehabilitation;
D O I
10.1053/apmr.2002.31203
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Objectives: To compare the mobility status (admission and discharge status, change in status) between patients with stroke and traumatic brain injury (TBI) during inpatient rehabilitation and to determine the relationship between mobility status and outcome variables including length of stay (LOS). Design: Prospective study. Setting: Free-standing tertiary rehabilitation center. Participants: A total of 210 patients with stroke (n = 136) and TBI (n = 74) consecutively admitted for inpatient rehabilitation. Interventions: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures: Clinical Outcome Variable Scale (COVS), a 13-item scale of mobility status (measured on admission and discharge from inpatient rehabilitation), and rehabilitation LOS. Results: With age and time since injury controlled in the model, the TBI group showed a significantly higher mobility status on admission and discharge over the stroke group, but the change (improvement) in mobility status did not differ. The admission mobility status accounted for 61% and 60% of variability of the discharge mobility status for the stroke and TBI groups, respectively. The admission mobility status accounted for 40% and 50% of the variability in rehabilitation LOS for the stroke and TBI groups, respectively. Either the admission mobility status or the physical therapist's prediction of the discharge status could be used to determine the actual discharge mobility status, although the physical therapist's predictions were more accurate than using a statistical model. Conclusions: The TBI group showed a higher mobility status at admission and discharge from inpatient rehabilitation than the stroke group; however, the rate of improvement (improvement in mobility status per day) did not differ between groups. Admission mobility status using the COVS was an excellent predictor of discharge mobility status and rehabilitation LOS in stroke and TBI patients.
引用
收藏
页码:483 / 490
页数:8
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
Brock K, 1997, J Qual Clin Pract, V17, P37
[2]   Post-stroke inpatient rehabilitation .1. Predicting length of stay [J].
Brosseau, L ;
Philippe, P ;
Potvin, L ;
Boulanger, YL .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE & REHABILITATION, 1996, 75 (06) :422-430
[3]   Post-stroke inpatient rehabilitation .2. Predicting discharge disposition [J].
Brosseau, L ;
Potvin, L ;
Philippe, P ;
Boulanger, YL .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE & REHABILITATION, 1996, 75 (06) :431-436
[4]  
CAREY RG, 1988, ARCH PHYS MED REHAB, V69, P337
[5]   ADMISSION MOTOR IMPAIRMENT AS A PREDICTOR OF PHYSICAL-DISABILITY AFTER STROKE REHABILITATION [J].
CHAE, J ;
JOHNSTON, M ;
KIM, HY ;
ZOROWITZ, R .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE & REHABILITATION, 1995, 74 (03) :218-223
[6]   RASCH ANALYSIS FOR OUTCOMES MEASURES - SOME METHODOLOGICAL CONSIDERATIONS [J].
CHANG, WC ;
CHAN, C .
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 1995, 76 (10) :934-939
[7]   INFLUENCE OF EARLY VARIABLES IN TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY ON FUNCTIONAL INDEPENDENCE MEASURE SCORES AND REHABILITATION LENGTH OF STAY AND CHARGES [J].
COWEN, TD ;
MEYTHALER, JM ;
DEVIVO, MJ ;
IVIE, CS ;
LEBOW, J ;
NOVACK, TA .
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 1995, 76 (09) :797-803
[8]  
DUNCAN P, 1989, DUKE MOBILITY SKILLS
[9]  
Franchignoni F, 1998, Ann Ist Super Sanita, V34, P463
[10]   Outcomes-based research in neurorehabilitation: The need for multidisciplinary team involvement [J].
Freeman, JA ;
Hobart, JC ;
Thompson, AJ .
DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 1996, 18 (02) :106-110