Effectiveness of motivationally adaptive computer-assisted instruction on the dynamic aspects of motivation

被引:123
作者
Song, SH [1 ]
Keller, JM
机构
[1] Andong Natl Univ, Andong, Peoples R China
[2] Florida State Univ, Tallahassee, FL 32306 USA
来源
ETR&D-EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT | 2001年 / 49卷 / 02期
关键词
D O I
10.1007/BF02504925
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of a prototype of motivationally-adaptive computer-assisted instruction (CAI). The foundation for motivational theory and design was provided by the ARCS model (an acronym formed from attention, relevance, confidence, and satisfaction). This model provides a definition of motivation, a motivational design process, and recommendations for Motivational strategies. Three treatment conditions were considered: (a) motivationally adaptive CAI, (b) motivationally saturated CAI, anti (c) motivationally minimized CAI. Dependent variables were effectiveness, perceived motivation (both overall motivation and each of A, R, C, & S components), efficiency, and continuing motivation. The motivationally adaptive CAI showed higher effectiveness, overall motivation, and attention than the other two CAI types. For efficiency, both motivationally adaptive CAI and motivationally minimized CAI were higher than motivationally saturated CAI. For continuing motivation, there were no significant differences among the three CAI types, but a significant correlation was found between overall motivation and continuing motivation across the three CAI types. This study supports the conclusion that CAI can be designed to be motivationally adaptive to respond to changes in learner motivation that may occur over time. It also illustrates that the ARCS model can be useful and effective in support of designing for these dynamic aspects of motivation.
引用
收藏
页码:5 / 22
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]  
Alschuler A., 1971, TEACHING ACHIEVEMENT
[2]  
ALSCHULER AS, 1973, DEV ACHIEVEMENT MOTI
[3]  
ASTLEITNER J, 1995, J RES COMPUTING ED, V27, P270
[4]  
ATKINSON RC, 1976, COGNITION INSTRUCT, P81
[5]  
BICKFORD NL, 1989, THESIS FLORIDA STATE
[6]  
Brown J. W., 1986, Educational Technology, V26, P27
[7]  
CLARK RE, 1983, REV EDUC RES, V53, P445, DOI 10.2307/1170217
[8]  
Del Soldato T., 1995, Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, V6, P337
[9]  
Dempsey J., 1993, Journal of Educational Technology Systems, V22, P173, DOI 10.2190/2TH7-5TXG-TAR7-T4V2
[10]  
DICK W, 1996, SYSTEMATIC DESIGN IN