A re-evaluation of the 'quantile approximation method' for random effects meta-analysis

被引:35
作者
Jackson, Dan [1 ]
Bowden, Jack [1 ]
机构
[1] Inst Publ Hlth, MRC, Biostat Unit, Cambridge CB2 2SR, England
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
meta-analysis random effects model; quantile approximation method; HETEROGENEITY; INFERENCE;
D O I
10.1002/sim.3487
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The quantile approximation method has recently been proposed as a simple method for deriving confidence intervals for the treatment effect in a random effects meta-analysis. Although easily implemented, the quantiles used to construct intervals are derived front a single simulation study. Here it is shown that altering the study parameters, and in particular introducing changes to the distribution of the within-study variances, can have a dramatic impact on the resulting quantiles. This is further illustrated analytically by examining the scenario where all trials are assumed to be the same size. A more Cautious approach is therefore suggested, where the conventional standard normal quantile is used in the primary analysis, but where the use of alternative quantiles is also considered in a sensitivity analysis. Copyright (C) 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:338 / 348
页数:11
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2002, METHODS METAANALYSIS
[2]   Using journal impact factors to correct for the publication bias of medical studies [J].
Baker, Rose ;
Jackson, Dan .
BIOMETRICS, 2006, 62 (03) :785-792
[3]  
Biggerstaff BJ, 1997, STAT MED, V16, P753, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19970415)16:7<753::AID-SIM494>3.0.CO
[4]  
2-G
[5]  
Böckenhoff A, 1998, BIOMETRICAL J, V40, P937, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1521-4036(199812)40:8<937::AID-BIMJ937>3.0.CO
[6]  
2-0
[7]   A simple method for inference on an overall effect in meta-analysis [J].
Brockwell, Sarah E. ;
Gordon, Ian R. .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2007, 26 (25) :4531-4543
[8]   METAANALYSIS IN CLINICAL-TRIALS [J].
DERSIMONIAN, R ;
LAIRD, N .
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 1986, 7 (03) :177-188
[9]   Simple robust procedures for combining risk differences in sets of 2x2 tables [J].
Emerson, JD ;
Hoaglin, DC ;
Mosteller, F .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 1996, 15 (14) :1465-1488
[10]   Valid inference in random effects meta-analysis [J].
Follmann, DA ;
Proschan, MA .
BIOMETRICS, 1999, 55 (03) :732-737