Vaginal breech delivery is still justified

被引:35
作者
Hauth, JC
Cunningham, FG
机构
[1] Univ Alabama, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Birmingham, AL 35233 USA
[2] Univ Texas, SW Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Dallas, TX 75235 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0029-7844(02)02031-8
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
[No abstract available]
引用
收藏
页码:1115 / 1116
页数:2
相关论文
共 6 条
[1]  
*AM COLL OBST GYN, 2001, ACOG COMM OP, V265
[2]  
*AM COLL OBST GYN, 2000, ACOG COMM OP, V219
[3]  
CUNNINGHAM FG, 2001, WILLIAMS OBSTET, P516
[4]   The MFMU cesarean registry: Infectious morbidity following primary cesarean section (C/S) [J].
Goepfert, A .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2001, 185 (06) :S192-S192
[5]   Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial [J].
Hannah, ME ;
Hannah, WJ ;
Hewson, SA ;
Hodnett, ED ;
Saigal, S ;
Willan, AR .
LANCET, 2000, 356 (9239) :1375-1383
[6]   Planned vaginal delivery versus elective caesarean section: a study of 705 singleton term breech presentations [J].
Irion, O ;
Almagbaly, PH ;
Morabia, A .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1998, 105 (07) :710-717