The role of familiarity in recognition

被引:21
作者
Greene, RL [1 ]
机构
[1] Case Western Reserve Univ, Dept Psychol, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
关键词
D O I
10.3758/BF03212335
中图分类号
B841 [心理学研究方法];
学科分类号
040201 ;
摘要
The role of familiarity in recognition was investigated by having subjects study a list of stimuli, some of which had been presented earlier in the experiment. The number of positive responses, both to targets and distracters, increased as a result of this familiarization process. This familiarization process had a greater effect on false alarms than on hits, so that recognition accuracy was lower for familiar stimuli than for relatively novel stimuli. This pattern of results differs from that found in most experiments studying the effects of linguistic word frequency on recognition.
引用
收藏
页码:309 / 312
页数:4
相关论文
共 9 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1944, TEACHERS WORDBOOK 30
[2]   Role of generalized and episode specific memories in the word frequency effect in recognition [J].
Chalmers, KA ;
Humphreys, MS .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 1998, 24 (03) :610-632
[3]   Distinctiveness in recognition and free recall: The role of recollection in the rejection of the familiar [J].
Dobbins, IG ;
Kroll, NEA ;
Yonelinas, AP ;
Liu, Q .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 1998, 38 (04) :381-400
[4]  
Estes W.K., 1994, CLASSIFICATION COGNI
[5]   A RETRIEVAL MODEL FOR BOTH RECOGNITION AND RECALL [J].
GILLUND, G ;
SHIFFRIN, RM .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1984, 91 (01) :1-67
[6]   THE MIRROR EFFECT IN RECOGNITION MEMORY [J].
GLANZER, M ;
ADAMS, JK .
MEMORY & COGNITION, 1985, 13 (01) :8-20
[7]   JUDGMENTS OF FREQUENCY AND RECOGNITION MEMORY IN A MULTIPLE-TRACE MEMORY MODEL [J].
HINTZMAN, DL .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1988, 95 (04) :528-551
[8]   Direct and indirect stimulus-frequency effects in recognition [J].
Maddox, WT ;
Estes, WK .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 1997, 23 (03) :539-559
[9]   NOVELTY ASSESSMENT IN THE BRAIN AND LONG-TERM-MEMORY ENCODING [J].
TULVING, E ;
KROLL, N .
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 1995, 2 (03) :387-390